Mulanjoor Nidhi Limited Rep. by its Managing Director Narayanankutty. N vs Sindhu R — 200308/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 order 7 rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 13th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPK130005022025
e-Filing Number
02-07-2025
Filing Number
524/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
200308/2025
Registration Date
03-07-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Ottappalam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mulanjoor Nidhi Limited Rep. by its Managing Director Narayanankutty. N
Adv. KUSALAN P P
Respondent(s)
Sindhu R
Sreenivasan P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Issue notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-02-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 27-11-2025 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 03-07-2025 | Issue notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Mulanjoor Nidhi Limited v. Sindhu R and Sreenivasan P (OS 308/2025) The Munsiff of Ottapalam decreed the plaintiff's money suit ex parte, ordering defendants to pay ₹36,392 (principal plus accrued interest on a ₹30,000 loan issued on 20.01.2024 at 18% per annum) with 12% interest from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, plus proportionate costs. The defendants' absence from court and uncontroverted testimony of the plaintiff's managing director and documentary evidence (loan application and promissory note) established the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mulanjoor Nidhi Limited v. Sindhu R and Sreenivasan P (OS 308/2025) The Munsiff of Ottapalam decreed the plaintiff's money suit ex parte, ordering defendants to pay ₹36,392 (principal plus accrued interest on a ₹30,000 loan issued on 20.01.2024 at 18% per annum) with 12% interest from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, plus proportionate costs. The defendants' absence from court and uncontroverted testimony of the plaintiff's managing director and documentary evidence (loan application and promissory note) established the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts