Sreekumar vs Suresh Babu Advocate - ADv TU Shaik Abdulla — 200090/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R66. Status: For Payment. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLPK120004042017

For Payment

Next Hearing

25th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200379/2017

Filing Date

30-11-2017

Registration No

200090/2017

Registration Date

30-11-2017

Court

Sub Court, Ottappalam

Judge

1-SUB JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section O21,R66

Petitioner(s)

Sreekumar

Adv. K.R.SANTHOSHKUMAR

Respondent(s)

Suresh Babu Advocate - ADv TU Shaik Abdulla

Divya

Hearing History

Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE

09-03-2026

For Payment

09-02-2026

For reports

05-01-2026

For reports

10-12-2025

For Payment

25-11-2025

For hearing EA

Interim Orders

12-10-2021
Order

SUMMARY: The court partially allowed the execution petition, fixing the market value of the scheduled properties at Rs.10,000 per cent and ordering the sale of only Item No.1 (1 acre 1 cent) to satisfy the decree debt of Rs.9,06,370 with costs. The court rejected the commissioner's valuation of Rs.6,000 per cent (based on outdated government fair value) and the village officer's valuation of Rs.17,500 per cent as unreliable, holding that Item No.2 need not be sold as Item No.1 alone is sufficient to recover the decretal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court partially allowed the execution petition, fixing the market value of the scheduled properties at Rs.10,000 per cent and ordering the sale of only Item No.1 (1 acre 1 cent) to satisfy the decree debt of Rs.9,06,370 with costs. The court rejected the commissioner's valuation of Rs.6,000 per cent (based on outdated government fair value) and the village officer's valuation of Rs.17,500 per cent as unreliable, holding that Item No.2 need not be sold as Item No.1 alone is sufficient to recover the decretal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Ottappalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case