SHAREEFA vs FATHIMA. K Advocate - SATHEESH KUMAR P — 105/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC 26 ORDER 7 RULE 1. Disposed: Uncontested--FINAL DECREE PASSED. on 12th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPK120002932025
Filing Number
335/2025
Filing Date
23-09-2025
Registration No
105/2025
Registration Date
23-09-2025
Court
Sub Court, Ottappalam
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--FINAL DECREE PASSED.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAREEFA
Adv. SREERAJ N
Respondent(s)
FATHIMA. K Advocate - SATHEESH KUMAR P
KADEEJA
Adv. SATHEESH KUMAR P
RAMLA
Adv. SATHEESH KUMAR P
MUHAMMED NISAR K M
Adv. SATHEESH KUMAR P
FARSEENA K M
Adv. SATHEESH KUMAR P
SHAMEEM P V
Adv. SATHEESH KUMAR P
SHIISHA FAIHA P V
Adv. SATHEESH KUMAR P
SHANSA FAIHA PV
Adv. SATHEESH KUMAR P
SHASHIN MUHAMMEDH PV
Adv. SATHEESH KUMAR P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE / ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Call on
Call on
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 09-02-2026 | Call on |
| 10-11-2025 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shareefa v. Fathima K & Others (OS 105/2025) The Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ottapalam decreed a partition suit filed by Shareefa against nine defendants under Muslim law. The court found that jointly-held properties were rightfully distributed with plaintiff receiving a 1/4 share in separate possession, defendants 1-2 each receiving 1/4 shares, and defendants 3-9 collectively receiving 1/4 share. The decree was granted based on defendants' admissions of the plaintiff's claims, with final division to be determined by a court-appointed commissioner within one month, subject to payment of requisite court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shareefa v. Fathima K & Others (OS 105/2025) The Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Ottapalam decreed a partition suit filed by Shareefa against nine defendants under Muslim law. The court found that jointly-held properties were rightfully distributed with plaintiff receiving a 1/4 share in separate possession, defendants 1-2 each receiving 1/4 shares, and defendants 3-9 collectively receiving 1/4 share. The decree was granted based on defendants' admissions of the plaintiff's claims, with final division to be determined by a court-appointed commissioner within one month, subject to payment of requisite court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts