Abdul Rasheed vs Junais Advocate - A.A.Jamal — 100521/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

OP MV - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)

CNR: KLPK110005742023

e-Filing Number

30-09-2023

Filing Number

100535/2023

Filing Date

04-Oct-2023

Registration No

100521/2023

Registration Date

04-Oct-2023

Court

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ottappalam

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AWARD PASSED

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Rasheed

    Adv. Mohammadali Mattamthadam

  2. 2.Rasiya

    Adv. Mohammadali Mattamthadam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Junais Advocate - A.A.Jamal

  2. 2.Shoukathali

    Adv. A.A.Jamal

  3. 3.Shreeram General Insurance Co. Ltd.,

    Adv. P.Rajasankar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ottapalam awarded ₹22,58,600 with 8% interest to the parents of a 17-year-old who died in a motor vehicle accident caused by the rash and negligent driving of the truck driver (respondent 1). The tribunal found the driver liable based on the police final report and directed the insurer (respondent 3) to pay the compensation, which included loss of dependency (₹21,16,800), consortium (₹96,800), funeral expenses (₹20,000), and loss of estate (₹20,000). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  6. 01-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Further evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Further evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Oct-2025

    Further evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  11. 03-Oct-2025

    Further evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  12. 15-Sep-2025

    Further evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  13. 21-Aug-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  14. 08-Aug-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  15. 07-Jul-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  16. 13-Jun-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  17. 15-May-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  18. 07-Apr-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  20. 24-Feb-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  21. 29-Jan-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  22. 01-Jan-2025

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  23. 29-Oct-2024

    for evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  24. 18-Sep-2024

    Await Records

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  25. 02-Aug-2024

    Await Records

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  26. 18-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge

  27. 21-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 04-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100521/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ottapalam awarded ₹22,58,600 with 8% interest to the parents of a 17-year-old who died in a motor vehicle accident caused by the rash and negligent driving of the truck driver (respondent 1). The tribunal found the driver liable based on the police final report and directed the insurer (respondent 3) to pay the compensation, which included loss of dependency (₹21,16,800), consortium (₹96,800), funeral expenses (₹20,000), and loss of estate (₹20,000). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case