Nasriya vs Husainkutty — 100370/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 163A. Disposed: Contested--AWARD PASSED on 08th April 2026.
OP MV - ORIGINAL PETITION (MOTOR VEHICLES)
CNR: KLPK110003972022
e-Filing Number
06-06-2022
Filing Number
100370/2022
Filing Date
07-Jun-2022
Registration No
100370/2022
Registration Date
07-Jun-2022
Court
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ottappalam
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AWARD PASSED
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nasriya
Adv. MOHAMMED ALI M
-
2.Fathima Nashva
Adv. MOHAMMED ALI M
-
3.Ibrahim
Adv. MOHAMMED ALI M
-
4.Ramla
Adv. MOHAMMED ALI M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Husainkutty
-
2.Bushara T
Adv. Sujith.M
-
3.Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd
Adv. S.Manoj
-
4.Sahir K
Adv. DIVYA SREE P,DIVYA SREE P
-
5.M/S P.S Agencies
-
6.IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. P PRASAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: OP(MV) No. 370/2022 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹5,00,000 compensation to the heirs of Muhammed Nasar, who died in a motor accident on 21.06.2021 when a Bolero jeep collided with a lorry. The tribunal found that since injuries arose from use of motor vehicles, claimants need only prove the accident—not negligence—under section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and that insurers cannot raise victim negligence defenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Order/ Judgement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
Further evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Further evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Issue notice
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
12-May-2025
For hearing on IA
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
For hearing on IA
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
For Counter in IA
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
For hearing on IA
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
For hearing on IA
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jan-2025
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Dec-2024
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2024
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2024
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Oct-2024
for evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
18-May-2024
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Addl District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100370/2022
Case Summary: OP(MV) No. 370/2022 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded ₹5,00,000 compensation to the heirs of Muhammed Nasar, who died in a motor accident on 21.06.2021 when a Bolero jeep collided with a lorry. The tribunal found that since injuries arose from use of motor vehicles, claimants need only prove the accident—not negligence—under section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and that insurers cannot raise victim negligence defenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts