Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd Rep Authorized Officer / Branch Manager Sreejith.N.P. vs Stebin Baiju — 294/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act1996\ Section 9 (2). Disposed: Uncontested--NOT PRESSED on 12th March 2026.
MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)
CNR: KLPK010063462025
Filing Number
995/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
294/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--NOT PRESSED
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd Rep Authorized Officer / Branch Manager Sreejith.N.P.
Adv. KAILAS K A
Respondent(s)
-
1.Stebin Baiju
-
2.Baiju
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Final OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 294/2025 The District Court of Palakkad dismissed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.'s Miscellaneous Application (Arbitration) against Stebin Baiju and Baiju on 12 March 2026. The application was dismissed as "not pressed" after the petitioner's counsel withdrew it during hearing, with the court making an endorsement to that effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
For Steps
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
For Steps
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
For Steps
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 294/2025
Case Summary: 294/2025 The District Court of Palakkad dismissed Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.'s Miscellaneous Application (Arbitration) against Stebin Baiju and Baiju on 12 March 2026. The application was dismissed as "not pressed" after the petitioner's counsel withdrew it during hearing, with the court making an endorsement to that effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts