Rev Father Olakkengil John Maria Viyani vs E T Rosalind Advocate - JOHN JOHN — 92/2025
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section order 43 rule 1. Status: For Hearing.. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
CNR: KLPK010061462025
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
826/2025
Filing Date
26-11-2025
Registration No
92/2025
Registration Date
29-11-2025
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad
Judge
4-IIIrd Addl. District and Sessions Court ADHOC-I ,Palakkad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rev Father Olakkengil John Maria Viyani
Adv. KURIACHAN M C
Respondent(s)
E T Rosalind Advocate - JOHN JOHN
E A Sebastian
Adv. JOHN JOHN
E A Jaseentha
Adv. JOHN JOHN
Justin K Kurian
Adv. GIRISH V V
Hearing History
Judge: 4-IIIrd Addl. District and Sessions Court ADHOC-I ,Palakkad
For Hearing.
Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice.
For Hearing.
Call with IA.
Call with IA.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | For Hearing. |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice. |
| 03-03-2026 | For Hearing. |
| 24-02-2026 | Call with IA. |
| 10-02-2026 | Call with IA. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 92/2025 The District Court of Palakkad granted Rev. Father Olakkengil John Maria Viyani's petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 20-day delay in filing his appeal in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 92/2025. The court found no sufficient medical evidence supporting his illness claim but granted one opportunity to advance his argument before the appellate court on the condition that he pay ₹2,500 to the respondents as costs within seven days, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The case was adjourned to 03.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 92/2025 The District Court of Palakkad granted Rev. Father Olakkengil John Maria Viyani's petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 20-day delay in filing his appeal in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 92/2025. The court found no sufficient medical evidence supporting his illness claim but granted one opportunity to advance his argument before the appellate court on the condition that he pay ₹2,500 to the respondents as costs within seven days, failing which the petition would be dismissed. The case was adjourned to 03.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad All courts →Explore other courts