Vijayakrishnan V vs Anitha V Advocate - KRISHNAKUMAR P — 93/2025

Case under Indian Succession Act \ Section 276. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

OP Probt - OP(PROBATE)

CNR: KLPK010033152025

Case disposed

Filing Number

819/2025

Filing Date

30-07-2025

Registration No

93/2025

Registration Date

31-07-2025

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad

Judge

5-IV Addl. District and Sessions Court ADHOC-II ,Palakkad

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT \ Section 276
IA/1/2025 Classification : Section Vijayakrishnan VAnitha V

Petitioner(s)

Vijayakrishnan V

Adv. Gopakumar K

Respondent(s)

Anitha V Advocate - KRISHNAKUMAR P

Hearing History

Judge: 5-IV Addl. District and Sessions Court ADHOC-II ,Palakkad

10-04-2026

Disposed

31-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

30-03-2026

Adjourn by notification

27-03-2026

FOR HEARING

26-03-2026

Adjourn by notification

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Order

Case 93/2025 Summary: The District Court of Palakkad granted probate to petitioner Vijayakrishnan V for the will of deceased K. Velayudhan Nair (executed 03.12.2019), which bequeathed 3 cents of land and an RC house to the petitioner. The court found the will validly executed based on testimony from the petitioner and an attesting witness, with no suspicious circumstances or evidence of undue influence, and the respondent (deceased's niece) did not contest it. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 93/2025 Summary: The District Court of Palakkad granted probate to petitioner Vijayakrishnan V for the will of deceased K. Velayudhan Nair (executed 03.12.2019), which bequeathed 3 cents of land and an RC house to the petitioner. The court found the will validly executed based on testimony from the petitioner and an attesting witness, with no suspicious circumstances or evidence of undue influence, and the respondent (deceased's niece) did not contest it. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case