S J Equipments vs DRM/W/PGT Advocate - Girish.V.V — 100516/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21rule43,54,66. Status: Stay report. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLPK010029432023

Stay report

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

101109/2023

Filing Date

12-06-2023

Registration No

100516/2023

Registration Date

27-06-2023

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad

Judge

4-IIIrd Addl. District and Sessions Court ADHOC-I ,Palakkad

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section O21rule43,54,66
E.A/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section DRM/W/PGTS J Equipments

Petitioner(s)

S J Equipments

Adv. Adarsh K V

Respondent(s)

DRM/W/PGT Advocate - Girish.V.V

Hearing History

Judge: 4-IIIrd Addl. District and Sessions Court ADHOC-I ,Palakkad

10-04-2026

Stay report

27-03-2026

Stay report

16-03-2026

Adjourned

13-03-2026

call on.

12-03-2026

call on.

Interim Orders

25-02-2025
Judgement

Case Summary: EP 516/2023 Outcome: Petition Allowed The District Judge Palakkad allowed S J Equipments' execution petition against DRM/Works, Southern Railways. The court ordered attachment and sale of the respondent's scheduled movable properties to realize the decree amount of ₹2,31,62,764.43 (as of May 31, 2023) plus future penal compound interest. The court rejected all of the judgment debtor's contentions regarding discharge of debt, interest calculation errors, and jurisdictional objections, finding them devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EP 516/2023 Outcome: Petition Allowed The District Judge Palakkad allowed S J Equipments' execution petition against DRM/Works, Southern Railways. The court ordered attachment and sale of the respondent's scheduled movable properties to realize the decree amount of ₹2,31,62,764.43 (as of May 31, 2023) plus future penal compound interest. The court rejected all of the judgment debtor's contentions regarding discharge of debt, interest calculation errors, and jurisdictional objections, finding them devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case