ITI Finance Ltd Rep by Branch Manager Arjun Sai.K.M. vs Dhanil.C.K. — 70/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act1996\ Section 9 (2). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 24th March 2026.

MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLPK010005462026

Case disposed

Filing Number

70/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

07-02-2026

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

arbitration and Conciliation Act1996\ Section 9 (2)
IA/1/2026 Classification : Application For Attachment Section ITI Finance Ltd Rep by Branch Manager Arjun Sai.K.M.Dhanil.C.K
IA/2/2026 Classification : Commission Application Section ITI Finance Ltd Rep by Branch Manager Arjun Sai.K.M.Dhanil.C.K

Petitioner(s)

ITI Finance Ltd Rep by Branch Manager Arjun Sai.K.M.

Adv. KAILAS K A

Respondent(s)

Dhanil.C.K.

Dhajeesh.C.K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

24-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

For Steps

12-02-2026

Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice.

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Final Order

Case 70/2026 Summary: The District Court of Palakkad granted ITI Finance Ltd.'s arbitration application under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against respondents Dhanil C.K. and Dhajeesh C.K. The court confirmed that an Advocate Commissioner had successfully seized a vehicle and handed it over to the petitioner as directed in an earlier interim order dated 12.02.2026, resulting in closure of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

12-02-2026
Order
12-02-2026
Order
casestatus.in Summary

Case 70/2026 Summary: The District Court of Palakkad granted ITI Finance Ltd.'s arbitration application under Section 9(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against respondents Dhanil C.K. and Dhajeesh C.K. The court confirmed that an Advocate Commissioner had successfully seized a vehicle and handed it over to the petitioner as directed in an earlier interim order dated 12.02.2026, resulting in closure of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case