Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd Rep Authorized Officer / Branch Manager Sreejith.N.P. vs Ajeema.H. — 68/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act1996\ Section 9 (2). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 12th March 2026.
MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)
CNR: KLPK010005442026
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
68/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd Rep Authorized Officer / Branch Manager Sreejith.N.P.
Adv. KAILAS K A
Respondent(s)
Ajeema.H.
Fakrudheen.A.
Ibrahim.K.M.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Disposed
Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | Issue notice to respondent. For return of Notice. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: MA (Arb.) 68/2026 Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. filed a Section 9(2) application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking attachment of a vehicle owned by respondents Ajeema.H., Fakrudheen.A., and Ibrahim.K.M. The District Judge of Palakkad appointed an Advocate Commissioner to seize and hand over the vehicle to the petitioner. Following the Commissioner's report confirming the vehicle was seized and delivered to the petitioner, the court closed the miscellaneous application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MA (Arb.) 68/2026 Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. filed a Section 9(2) application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking attachment of a vehicle owned by respondents Ajeema.H., Fakrudheen.A., and Ibrahim.K.M. The District Judge of Palakkad appointed an Advocate Commissioner to seize and hand over the vehicle to the petitioner. Following the Commissioner's report confirming the vehicle was seized and delivered to the petitioner, the court closed the miscellaneous application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad All courts →Explore other courts