ITI Finance Ltd Rep by Branch Manager Arjun Sai.K.M. vs Anandhu.S.Menon — 67/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act1996\ Section 9 (2). Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

MA(Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLPK010005432026

Filing Number

67/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Palakkad

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act1996\ Section 9 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ITI Finance Ltd Rep by Branch Manager Arjun Sai.K.M.

    Adv. KAILAS K A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anandhu.S.Menon

  2. 2.Sivaprakasan.V.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Final OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: ITI Finance Ltd v. Anandhu S. Menon & Sivaprakasan V. (67/2026) The District Judge of Palakkad granted ITI Finance Ltd's Section 9(2) arbitration application by directing an Advocate Commissioner to attach and seize a vehicle from the respondents and hand it over to the petitioner. Upon the Commissioner's confirmation that the vehicle was successfully seized and delivered, the court closed the application on March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ITI Finance Ltd v. Anandhu S. Menon & Sivaprakasan V. (67/2026) The District Judge of Palakkad granted ITI Finance Ltd's Section 9(2) arbitration application by directing an Advocate Commissioner to attach and seize a vehicle from the respondents and hand it over to the petitioner. Upon the Commissioner's confirmation that the vehicle was successfully seized and delivered, the court closed the application on March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case