Kerala Gramin Bank, Kalady Branch (Rep.by Its Manager) vs Mohamed Kutty V K Advocate - VINUNATH P.V., JITHIN BABU V P — 300149/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26, Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Call with IA. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML230003972023
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-08-2023
Filing Number
427/2023
Filing Date
21-08-2023
Registration No
300149/2023
Registration Date
22-08-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Ponnani
Judge
1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kerala Gramin Bank, Kalady Branch (Rep.by Its Manager)
Adv. SURESH A
Respondent(s)
Mohamed Kutty V K Advocate - VINUNATH P.V., JITHIN BABU V P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Call with IA
No sitting notified
Call on
Call with IA
For Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Call with IA | |
| 12-01-2026 | No sitting notified | |
| 18-11-2025 | Call on | |
| 13-10-2025 | Call with IA | |
| 19-08-2025 | For Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court in Ponnani allowed Kerala Gramin Bank's interlocutory application for pre-judgment attachment of the defendant's property. The court ordered attachment of the defendant's property (described in Document No. 1710 of 1979) for ₹2,00,000, finding that the defendant attempted to dispose of assets to obstruct execution of a potential decree and failed to respond despite service of notice. The attachment order can be lifted if the defendant furnishes security of ₹2,00,000 to the court's satisfaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court in Ponnani allowed Kerala Gramin Bank's interlocutory application for pre-judgment attachment of the defendant's property. The court ordered attachment of the defendant's property (described in Document No. 1710 of 1979) for ₹2,00,000, finding that the defendant attempted to dispose of assets to obstruct execution of a potential decree and failed to respond despite service of notice. The attachment order can be lifted if the defendant furnishes security of ₹2,00,000 to the court's satisfaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts