Sainudheen (Rep by POA Shaheer) vs Suresh.P. Advocate - SURESH EC — 300024/2024
Case under Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (kerala) Section Section11(3). Status: Orders in IA. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLML230002842024
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
24-07-2024
Filing Number
303/2024
Filing Date
26-07-2024
Registration No
300024/2024
Registration Date
26-07-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Ponnani
Judge
1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sainudheen (Rep by POA Shaheer)
Adv. Shanavas P
Salih (Rep by POA Moiduhaji)
Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P
Shaheer
Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P
Abdul Jishar (Rep by POA Shaheer)
Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P
Shebeer (Rep by POA Shaheer)
Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P
Respondent(s)
Suresh.P. Advocate - SURESH EC
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Orders in IA
Orders in IA
Call with IA
Call with IA
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Orders in IA | |
| 09-02-2026 | Orders in IA | |
| 06-01-2026 | Call with IA | |
| 16-12-2025 | Call with IA | |
| 09-12-2025 | Call with IA |
Interim Orders
Summary The Rent Control Court of Ponnani allowed the interlocutory application and remitted the Advocate Commissioner's Report dated 27.05.2025 for further proceedings. The court found the report incomplete as it failed to adequately address the building's maintenance condition, lack of amenities, and the petitioner's work memo, which are crucial factors for determining fair rent. The Advocate Commissioner is directed to resubmit a comprehensive report considering the property's age, maintenance status, available amenities, and comparable buildings of similar facilities. The tenant shall pay ₹4,500 as initial cost, and both parties may file work memos. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Rent Control Court of Ponnani allowed the interlocutory application and remitted the Advocate Commissioner's Report dated 27.05.2025 for further proceedings. The court found the report incomplete as it failed to adequately address the building's maintenance condition, lack of amenities, and the petitioner's work memo, which are crucial factors for determining fair rent. The Advocate Commissioner is directed to resubmit a comprehensive report considering the property's age, maintenance status, available amenities, and comparable buildings of similar facilities. The tenant shall pay ₹4,500 as initial cost, and both parties may file work memos. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts