Sainudheen (POA Shaheer) and others vs Subaida K V Advocate - SURESH EC — 300022/2024

Case under Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section Section11(3). Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

For Steps Next hearing 25-May-2026 this date has passed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLML230002812024

e-Filing Number

24-07-2024

Filing Number

300/2024

Filing Date

26-Jul-2024

Registration No

300022/2024

Registration Date

26-Jul-2024

Court

Munsiff Court, Ponnani

Judge

1-Munsiff-Magistrate

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section Section11(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sainudheen (POA Shaheer) and others

    Adv. Shanavas P

  2. 2.Salih (Rep by POA Shaheer)

    Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P

  3. 3.Shaheer

    Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P

  4. 4.Abdul Jishar (Rep by POA Shaheer)

    Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P

  5. 5.Shebeer (POA Shaheer)

    Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subaida K V Advocate - SURESH EC

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Objection

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  10. 28-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Rent Control Court of Ponnani allowed the interlocutory application and remitted the Advocate Commissioner's Report for further proceedings. The court found that the Commissioner's report failed to adequately consider the tenant's work memo and omitted crucial details about the building's maintenance condition, lack of amenities, and comparable rent references. The Advocate Commissioner is now directed to resubmit a comprehensive report specifically addressing the property's age, current maintenance condition, available amenities, and comparable rents only from structurally and amenity-wise similar buildings. The tenant must pay ₹4,500 as initial cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  12. 07-Oct-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  13. 29-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  15. 09-Sep-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  17. 12-Aug-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  18. 30-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  19. 15-Jul-2025

    Referred to Mediator

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  20. 07-Jul-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  21. 24-Jun-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  22. 16-Jun-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  23. 03-Jun-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  24. 20-May-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  25. 07-Apr-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  26. 17-Mar-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  27. 25-Feb-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  28. 28-Jan-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  29. 14-Jan-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  30. 16-Dec-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  31. 02-Dec-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  32. 19-Nov-2024

    Adjourned

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  33. 04-Nov-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  34. 15-Oct-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  35. 01-Oct-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  36. 09-Sep-2024

    Issue notice

    Munsiff-Magistrate

  37. 26-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 26-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300022/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rent Control Court of Ponnani allowed the interlocutory application and remitted the Advocate Commissioner's Report for further proceedings. The court found that the Commissioner's report failed to adequately consider the tenant's work memo and omitted crucial details about the building's maintenance condition, lack of amenities, and comparable rent references. The Advocate Commissioner is now directed to resubmit a comprehensive report specifically addressing the property's age, current maintenance condition, available amenities, and comparable rents only from structurally and amenity-wise similar buildings. The tenant must pay ₹4,500 as initial cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case