Sainudheen (POA Shaheer) and others vs Subaida K V Advocate - SURESH EC — 300022/2024
Case under Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (kerala) Section Section11(3). Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLML230002812024
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
24-07-2024
Filing Number
300/2024
Filing Date
26-07-2024
Registration No
300022/2024
Registration Date
26-07-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Ponnani
Judge
1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sainudheen (POA Shaheer) and others
Adv. Shanavas P
Salih (Rep by POA Shaheer)
Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P
Shaheer
Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P
Abdul Jishar (Rep by POA Shaheer)
Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P
Shebeer (POA Shaheer)
Adv. Shanavas P,Shanavas P
Respondent(s)
Subaida K V Advocate - SURESH EC
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate
For Steps
Orders in IA
FOR HEARING
Objection
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | For Steps | |
| 09-02-2026 | Orders in IA | |
| 06-01-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 16-12-2025 | Objection | |
| 09-12-2025 | Call with IA |
Interim Orders
Summary The Rent Control Court of Ponnani allowed the interlocutory application and remitted the Advocate Commissioner's Report for further proceedings. The court found that the Commissioner's report failed to adequately consider the tenant's work memo and omitted crucial details about the building's maintenance condition, lack of amenities, and comparable rent references. The Advocate Commissioner is now directed to resubmit a comprehensive report specifically addressing the property's age, current maintenance condition, available amenities, and comparable rents only from structurally and amenity-wise similar buildings. The tenant must pay ₹4,500 as initial cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Rent Control Court of Ponnani allowed the interlocutory application and remitted the Advocate Commissioner's Report for further proceedings. The court found that the Commissioner's report failed to adequately consider the tenant's work memo and omitted crucial details about the building's maintenance condition, lack of amenities, and comparable rent references. The Advocate Commissioner is now directed to resubmit a comprehensive report specifically addressing the property's age, current maintenance condition, available amenities, and comparable rents only from structurally and amenity-wise similar buildings. The tenant must pay ₹4,500 as initial cost. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts