Jayapaash K S vs Raghavan V P — 300127/2024

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section section26, Order 7, rule1. Status: BCF and steps. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLML230002302024

BCF and steps

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

e-Filing Number

28-06-2024

Filing Number

248/2024

Filing Date

28-06-2024

Registration No

300127/2024

Registration Date

28-06-2024

Court

Munsiff Court, Ponnani

Judge

1-Munsiff-Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section section26, Order 7, rule1
IA/3/2025 Classification : Section Raghavan V P
IA/4/2025 Classification : Section Raghavan V P
IA/1/2026 Classification : Application Seeking Extension Of Time Section Jayapaash K SRaghavan V P

Petitioner(s)

Jayapaash K S

Adv. ANUROOPA T C

Respondent(s)

Raghavan V P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate

30-03-2026

BCF and steps

09-03-2026

For reports

17-02-2026

For reports

09-12-2025

BCF and steps

06-10-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

27-08-2025
Order

SUMMARY The Munsiff-Magistrate of Ponnani allowed the interlocutory application filed by the defendant Raghavan V.P., lifting the attachment on his property and substituting it with his brother-in-law's garden land (Document No. 1680 of 2014), valued at ₹12,80,000, which adequately secures the plaintiff's claim of ₹8,00,000. The court accepted the brother-in-law's sworn affidavit consenting to the attachment and waiving future objections, finding the substitution appropriate given the defendant's compelling need to sell his property for his daughter's marriage. The petitioner was ordered to bear the costs of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Munsiff-Magistrate of Ponnani allowed the interlocutory application filed by the defendant Raghavan V.P., lifting the attachment on his property and substituting it with his brother-in-law's garden land (Document No. 1680 of 2014), valued at ₹12,80,000, which adequately secures the plaintiff's claim of ₹8,00,000. The court accepted the brother-in-law's sworn affidavit consenting to the attachment and waiving future objections, finding the substitution appropriate given the defendant's compelling need to sell his property for his daughter's marriage. The petitioner was ordered to bear the costs of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Ponnani All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case