Kottarathil Sreenivasan vs Kunnathu Mohemmedkutty — 300127/2020
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26, Order 7, Rule 1. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML230002252020
Filing Number
238/2020
Filing Date
24-Aug-2020
Registration No
300127/2020
Registration Date
24-Aug-2020
Court
Munsiff Court, Ponnani
Judge
1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kottarathil Sreenivasan
Adv. Basheer PP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kunnathu Mohemmedkutty
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
For commission report
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
19-Feb-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Orders in IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
JudgementView PDF
Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court of Ponnani allowed Interlocutory Application No. 10/2025 and restored I.A. No. 4/2024, which had been dismissed for default on 21.10.2024. The defendant sought restoration arguing his counsel's failure to represent him was not willful negligence, and restoring the application was essential to challenge the Advocate Commissioner's report in the underlying property dispute suit. The court, prioritizing merit-based litigation despite noting the defendant's pattern of non-appearance, granted the restoration on terms: the defendant must pay ₹5,000 as cost to the plaintiff within one week and diligently prosecute I.A. No. 4/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Nov-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2025
Orders in IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2025
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Listed to
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2025
For Steps
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2025
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
27-May-2025
For Steps
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2025
Call with IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2025
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2025
For Steps
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2024
Orders in IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2024
Call with IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2024
for evidence
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2024
for evidence
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2024
Objection to Cr
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2024
Verify and report
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2024
Issue notice
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2024
For Steps
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2024
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2024
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
04-Dec-2023
Listed to
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2023
Listed to
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
31-Jul-2023
For Steps
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
30-May-2023
Call with IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2023
Issues
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2023
For Counter in IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
22-Nov-2022
Judge on leave / duty
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
03-Oct-2022
Judge on leave / duty
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
09-Aug-2022
For Hearing
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2022
For Hearing
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
15-Mar-2022
For commission report
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
17-Jan-2022
No sitting notified
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2021
For commission report
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
06-Dec-2021
Bcf and steps
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
11-Oct-2021
No sitting notified
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2021
No sitting notified
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2021
No sitting notified
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
15-Mar-2021
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2021
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2020
Written Statement
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
09-Nov-2020
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2020
Written Statement
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
24-Aug-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Aug-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 300127/2020
Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court of Ponnani allowed Interlocutory Application No. 10/2025 and restored I.A. No. 4/2024, which had been dismissed for default on 21.10.2024. The defendant sought restoration arguing his counsel's failure to represent him was not willful negligence, and restoring the application was essential to challenge the Advocate Commissioner's report in the underlying property dispute suit. The court, prioritizing merit-based litigation despite noting the defendant's pattern of non-appearance, granted the restoration on terms: the defendant must pay ₹5,000 as cost to the plaintiff within one week and diligently prosecute I.A. No. 4/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts