Ungungungal Namaskara Palli Committee vs Faluludheen — 300286/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC26ORDER7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE. on 09th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML200006162023
e-Filing Number
06-11-2023
Filing Number
607/2023
Filing Date
06-11-2023
Registration No
300286/2023
Registration Date
06-11-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Parappanagadi
Judge
4-Munsiff,Parappanangadi
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ungungungal Namaskara Palli Committee
Adv. ABOOBACKER SIDHEEQUE P
Muhammed Mujeeb Rahman
Adv. ABOOBACKER SIDHEEQUE P
Respondent(s)
Faluludheen
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Munsiff,Parappanangadi
Disposed
Report on mediation
Appearance of Partie
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 29-01-2026 | Report on mediation | |
| 27-01-2026 | Appearance of Partie | |
| 25-11-2025 | Issues | |
| 27-08-2025 | Issues |
Final Orders / Judgements
Judgement
Interim Orders
Summary The Munsiff court partially allowed the injunction petition (IA 2/2023) and allowed the defendant's counter-petition (IA 6/2024), confining the injunction to a 10-foot width of the disputed accessway instead of the plaintiff's claimed 12 feet. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of easement rights but prioritized the defendant's greater irreparable injury from halting construction already begun with proper permits, conditioning any final judgment against the defendant on removal of constructed portions at their own expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Munsiff court partially allowed the injunction petition (IA 2/2023) and allowed the defendant's counter-petition (IA 6/2024), confining the injunction to a 10-foot width of the disputed accessway instead of the plaintiff's claimed 12 feet. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of easement rights but prioritized the defendant's greater irreparable injury from halting construction already begun with proper permits, conditioning any final judgment against the defendant on removal of constructed portions at their own expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts