Ungungungal Namaskara Palli Committee vs Faluludheen — 300286/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC26ORDER7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE. on 09th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML200006162023
e-Filing Number
06-11-2023
Filing Number
607/2023
Filing Date
06-Nov-2023
Registration No
300286/2023
Registration Date
06-Nov-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Parappanagadi
Judge
4-Munsiff,Parappanangadi
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE.
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ungungungal Namaskara Palli Committee
Adv. ABOOBACKER SIDHEEQUE P
-
2.Muhammed Mujeeb Rahman
Adv. ABOOBACKER SIDHEEQUE P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Faluludheen
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgement
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
29-Jan-2026
Report on mediation
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
27-Jan-2026
Appearance of Partie
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
25-Nov-2025
Issues
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
27-Aug-2025
Issues
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
05-Aug-2025
Issues
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
21-May-2025
Issues
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
03-Mar-2025
Issues
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
07-Jan-2025
Issues
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
16-Nov-2024
For reports
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
30-Oct-2024
For reports
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
13-Aug-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
28-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
25-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
17-Feb-2024
OrderView PDF
-
17-Feb-2024
OrderView PDF
-
17-Feb-2024
OrderView PDF
-
17-Feb-2024
OrderView PDF
-
17-Feb-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary The Munsiff court partially allowed the injunction petition (IA 2/2023) and allowed the defendant's counter-petition (IA 6/2024), confining the injunction to a 10-foot width of the disputed accessway instead of the plaintiff's claimed 12 feet. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of easement rights but prioritized the defendant's greater irreparable injury from halting construction already begun with proper permits, conditioning any final judgment against the defendant on removal of constructed portions at their own expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
07-Feb-2024
Order/Judgement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
02-Feb-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
31-Jan-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
25-Jan-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
20-Jan-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
06-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
04-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 300286/2023
Summary The Munsiff court partially allowed the injunction petition (IA 2/2023) and allowed the defendant's counter-petition (IA 6/2024), confining the injunction to a 10-foot width of the disputed accessway instead of the plaintiff's claimed 12 feet. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of easement rights but prioritized the defendant's greater irreparable injury from halting construction already begun with proper permits, conditioning any final judgment against the defendant on removal of constructed portions at their own expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts