Madhusoodanan vs Pattayil Vallattayil Paramanandan Advocate - Ajay Kumar P — 300210/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1). Status: call on. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML200004182017
Filing Number
417/2017
Filing Date
25-Aug-2017
Registration No
300210/2017
Registration Date
25-Aug-2017
Court
Munsiff Court, Parappanagadi
Judge
4-Munsiff,Parappanangadi
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Madhusoodanan
Adv. T.Ramankutty Menon
-
2.Reeja bai
Adv. T.Ramankutty Menon
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pattayil Vallattayil Paramanandan Advocate - Ajay Kumar P
-
2.Praseetha
Adv. Ajaykumar.P
-
3.Chinnammu
Adv. Ajay Kumar P
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
28-Jan-2026
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
04-Dec-2025
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
28-Oct-2025
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
23-Aug-2025
Stayed Call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
25-Jul-2025
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
20-Jun-2025
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
28-Feb-2025
Stayed Call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
15-Jan-2025
Stayed Call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
21-Dec-2024
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
09-Dec-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
30-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
28-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
28-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Munsiff's Court of Parappanangadi dismissed three interlocutory applications (IA 11/2024, 12/2024, and 13/2024) filed by plaintiffs in Original Suit No. 210 of 2017 for recovery of possession. The court rejected petitions seeking to reopen plaintiff evidence, summon the first defendant, and cross-examine him, holding that plaintiffs cannot compel opposing parties to testify as a matter of right and no compelling reason was established to warrant such examination. The court emphasized that in possession suits based on title, the burden lies on plaintiffs to prove their case independently, not on defendants' weakness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
23-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
22-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
12-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
07-Nov-2024
for evidence
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
02-Nov-2024
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
11-Sep-2024
Listed to
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
22-Jul-2024
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
23-May-2024
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
02-Mar-2024
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
24-Feb-2024
Orders in IA
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
12-Feb-2024
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
27-Nov-2023
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
27-Oct-2023
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
16-Oct-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
08-Sep-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
10-Aug-2023
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
27-Jul-2023
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
10-Jul-2023
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
06-Jul-2023
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
15-Jun-2023
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
25-May-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
16-Feb-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
09-Feb-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
07-Feb-2023
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
03-Feb-2023
For counter and hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
20-Jan-2023
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
17-Nov-2022
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
22-Aug-2022
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
20-Jun-2022
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
21-Mar-2022
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
07-Feb-2022
For commission report
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
05-Feb-2022
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
01-Feb-2022
call on
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
31-Jan-2022
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
21-Jan-2022
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
08-Dec-2021
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
25-Oct-2021
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
20-Oct-2021
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
12-Oct-2021
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
29-Sep-2021
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
27-Aug-2021
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
12-Aug-2021
For counter
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
31-Jul-2021
Issue Summons
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
18-Jun-2021
Issue Summons
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
31-Mar-2021
Issue Summons
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
18-Mar-2021
For carry out amendment
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
01-Mar-2021
For carry out amendment
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
25-Feb-2021
For counter and hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
05-Feb-2021
For counter and hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
05-Nov-2020
For counter and hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
15-Jul-2020
For counter and hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
06-Mar-2020
For carry out amendment
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
23-Oct-2019
For carry out amendment
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
21-Jun-2019
For Steps
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
19-Mar-2019
Issues
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
07-Feb-2019
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
06-Dec-2018
Issues
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
01-Oct-2018
For Hearing
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
24-Jul-2018
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
20-Jun-2018
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
15-Mar-2018
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
15-Jan-2018
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
17-Nov-2017
Written Statement
Munsiff,Parappanangadi
-
19-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 300210/2017
Summary: The Munsiff's Court of Parappanangadi dismissed three interlocutory applications (IA 11/2024, 12/2024, and 13/2024) filed by plaintiffs in Original Suit No. 210 of 2017 for recovery of possession. The court rejected petitions seeking to reopen plaintiff evidence, summon the first defendant, and cross-examine him, holding that plaintiffs cannot compel opposing parties to testify as a matter of right and no compelling reason was established to warrant such examination. The court emphasized that in possession suits based on title, the burden lies on plaintiffs to prove their case independently, not on defendants' weakness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts