JASHEELA N T vs ABDUL SALAM Advocate - MUHAMMED RASHID N — 224/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 26 RULE 7. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 29-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLML170009682025

Filing Number

849/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

224/2025

Registration Date

12-Nov-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Perinthalmanna

Judge

1-Munsif Magistrate, Perinthalmanna

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 26 RULE 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASHEELA N T

    Adv. MUHAMMED RAFEEQ V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL SALAM Advocate - MUHAMMED RASHID N

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsif Magistrate, Perinthalmanna

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsif Magistrate, Perinthalmanna

  4. 12-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Perinthalmanna granted a conditional order of attachment of the defendant's scheduled property under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court issued a show cause notice requiring the defendant (Abdul Salam) to furnish security of Rs. 8,00,000 or appear to justify why security should not be furnished, finding that the defendant intended to alienate property to defeat the decree. The case is returnable on 16-12-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 224/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court, Perinthalmanna granted a conditional order of attachment of the defendant's scheduled property under Order 38 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court issued a show cause notice requiring the defendant (Abdul Salam) to furnish security of Rs. 8,00,000 or appear to justify why security should not be furnished, finding that the defendant intended to alienate property to defeat the decree. The case is returnable on 16-12-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case