Koyanni vs Veerankutty — 300033/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section26,Order7,Rule1. Status: For paper Publication. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML170005842014
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
300033/2008
Filing Date
12-12-2014
Registration No
300033/2008
Registration Date
12-12-2014
Court
Munsiff Court, Perinthalmanna
Judge
1-Munsif Magistrate, Perinthalmanna
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Koyanni
Respondent(s)
Veerankutty
Musthafa
Pokker Haji
Muhammed
Kunjimuhammed
Kadeeja
Muhammadali
Fathimath Jameela
Fathimath Suhara
Ayisha
Hibathulla
Shoukath
Ayisha Umma
Moidu
Hamza
FATHIMA
Muhammadali
Saithalavi
Asharaf
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsif Magistrate, Perinthalmanna
For paper Publication
Paper Publication produced-Await report Affixture
Written Statement
To summon witness
Issue Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | For paper Publication | |
| 09-03-2026 | Paper Publication produced-Await report Affixture | |
| 17-02-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 27-01-2026 | To summon witness | |
| 16-12-2025 | Issue Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court (Perinthalmanna) decreed a suit for recovery of possession filed by Koyanni against seven defendants. The plaintiff, as the legal heir of Ayishakutty Umma who held kanom rights to the property, successfully proved his title and possession claims through documentary evidence including a 1964 sale deed and legal heirship certificate. The court directed the defendants to surrender vacant possession of the scheduled property (survey no. 114/1, approximately 1 acre 57.9 cents) to the plaintiff within two months and awarded costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Munsiff-Magistrate Court (Perinthalmanna) decreed a suit for recovery of possession filed by Koyanni against seven defendants. The plaintiff, as the legal heir of Ayishakutty Umma who held kanom rights to the property, successfully proved his title and possession claims through documentary evidence including a 1964 sale deed and legal heirship certificate. The court directed the defendants to surrender vacant possession of the scheduled property (survey no. 114/1, approximately 1 acre 57.9 cents) to the plaintiff within two months and awarded costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts