Haneefa(Died) vs Ayamu. Advocate - Ashique C.H — 1/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S 26 O7 R1. Status: For additional written statement. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML170000012017
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2017
Filing Date
05-01-2017
Registration No
1/2017
Registration Date
05-01-2017
Court
Munsiff Court, Perinthalmanna
Judge
1-Munsif Magistrate, Perinthalmanna
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Haneefa(Died)
Adv. N.P.Saleena.
Fathima
Muhammed Harif
Muhammed Hashik
Raihanath
Respondent(s)
Ayamu. Advocate - Ashique C.H
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsif Magistrate, Perinthalmanna
For additional written statement
Call with IA
Pre trial steps
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | For additional written statement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Call with IA | |
| 23-02-2026 | Pre trial steps | |
| 09-02-2026 | Issues | |
| 12-01-2026 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Suit Decreed with Costs; Counterclaim Dismissed The Munsiff-Magistrate Court in Perinthalmanna granted permanent and mandatory injunctions in favor of plaintiff Haneefa in a property dispute case. The court ordered the defendant to reconstruct a demolished hollow-brick boundary wall within 30 days and restrained him from trespassing on or annexing the plaintiff's property. The defendant's counterclaim seeking recovery of disputed property portions was dismissed, and he was directed to pay the plaintiff's suit costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Suit Decreed with Costs; Counterclaim Dismissed The Munsiff-Magistrate Court in Perinthalmanna granted permanent and mandatory injunctions in favor of plaintiff Haneefa in a property dispute case. The court ordered the defendant to reconstruct a demolished hollow-brick boundary wall within 30 days and restrained him from trespassing on or annexing the plaintiff's property. The defendant's counterclaim seeking recovery of disputed property portions was dismissed, and he was directed to pay the plaintiff's suit costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts