Ayisha vs Avaran Kutty Advocate - MOOSAKUTTY, Noufal — 309/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26(7)(1). Status: Call with IA. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLML130012032025

Call with IA

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

770/2025

Filing Date

07-11-2025

Registration No

309/2025

Registration Date

07-11-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court

Judge

1-Munsiff Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26(7)(1)
IA/1/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section AyishaAvaran Kutty
IA/2/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section AyishaAvaran Kutty
IA/3/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section AyishaAvaran Kutty
IA/4/2025 Classification : Injunction Extension Petition Section AyishaAvaran Kutty

Petitioner(s)

Ayisha

Adv. ARSHAD AYYOOB K H

Respondent(s)

Avaran Kutty Advocate - MOOSAKUTTY, Noufal

Musthafa

Adv. MOOSAKUTTY,Noufal

KunjiMuhammed

Adv. MOOSAKUTTY,Noufal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate

09-03-2026

Call with IA

17-12-2025

Written Statement

16-12-2025

Written Statement

Interim Orders

07-11-2025
Order

Case Summary: The Court of the Munsiff, Tirur granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of petitioner Ayisha against respondents Avarankutty, Musthafa, and Kunhimuhammed in a property boundary dispute. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo regarding the petition schedule property boundaries as determined by the commissioner until the next hearing. Notice has been issued to the respondents, and the petitioner must comply with Order 39 Rule 3(a) & (b) of the Civil Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Court of the Munsiff, Tirur granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of petitioner Ayisha against respondents Avarankutty, Musthafa, and Kunhimuhammed in a property boundary dispute. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo regarding the petition schedule property boundaries as determined by the commissioner until the next hearing. Notice has been issued to the respondents, and the petitioner must comply with Order 39 Rule 3(a) & (b) of the Civil Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case