Moonnukandathil Saidalavi vs Moonnukandathil Ismail Advocate - M.A. M. Rafeek — 300287/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML130007382018
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1627/2018
Filing Date
29-10-2018
Registration No
300287/2018
Registration Date
29-10-2018
Court
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Moonnukandathil Saidalavi
Adv. S. Hariharan
Respondent(s)
Moonnukandathil Ismail Advocate - M.A. M. Rafeek
Moonnukandathil Muhammed
Moonnukandathil Ibrahim
Moonnukandathil Mariyamu
Moonnukandathil Sainaba
Ayishamu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 21-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 18-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Munsiff's Court, Tirur partially allowed the Interlocutory Application (IA No. 03 of 2025) filed by defendants seeking to frame additional issues in Original Suit No. 287 of 2018 (a suit for cancellation of a gift deed and prohibitory injunction). The court rejected the defendants' request to frame an issue on maintainability, holding that vague pleadings without specific grounds are insufficient; however, it allowed the framing of one additional issue on whether the suit is barred by limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Munsiff's Court, Tirur partially allowed the Interlocutory Application (IA No. 03 of 2025) filed by defendants seeking to frame additional issues in Original Suit No. 287 of 2018 (a suit for cancellation of a gift deed and prohibitory injunction). The court rejected the defendants' request to frame an issue on maintainability, holding that vague pleadings without specific grounds are insufficient; however, it allowed the framing of one additional issue on whether the suit is barred by limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts