Alavikkutty vs Abdurahiman Advocate - Arun Shameem.C.H, Arun Shameem.C.H — 200075/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 38. Status: Call on. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLML120006672023

Call on

Next Hearing

25th May 2026

e-Filing Number

26-09-2023

Filing Number

358/2023

Filing Date

18-10-2023

Registration No

200075/2023

Registration Date

18-10-2023

Court

Sub Court, Tirur

Judge

1-Subordinate/Asst.Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section ORDER 21 RULE 38
EA/1/2025 Classification : Application To Recall Warrant Section AlavikkuttyAbdurahiman
EA/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section AlavikkuttyAbdurahiman

Petitioner(s)

Alavikkutty

Adv. GOPI KADAVATH

Respondent(s)

Abdurahiman Advocate - Arun Shameem.C.H, Arun Shameem.C.H

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate/Asst.Sessions Judge

09-04-2026

Call on

09-03-2026

Issue Arrest Warrant

05-03-2026

For Steps

17-02-2026

Verify and report

31-01-2026

Verify and report

Interim Orders

26-08-2025
Interim Order

Summary The execution petition filed by Alavikkutty to recover a decree debt of ₹12,50,000 with 6% interest and costs was allowed. The court found that the respondent Abdurahiman has sufficient means to pay the debt (evidenced by property purchases in 2004 and 2005) but willfully neglected to do so. The respondent is ordered to be detained in Civil Prison for 1 month for non-payment of the decree debt, and the petitioner must deposit necessary batta within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The execution petition filed by Alavikkutty to recover a decree debt of ₹12,50,000 with 6% interest and costs was allowed. The court found that the respondent Abdurahiman has sufficient means to pay the debt (evidenced by property purchases in 2004 and 2005) but willfully neglected to do so. The respondent is ordered to be detained in Civil Prison for 1 month for non-payment of the decree debt, and the petitioner must deposit necessary batta within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Tirur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case