Assainar vs Kuruppath Muhammed — 77/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLML120004102017
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200240/2017
Filing Date
10-10-2017
Registration No
77/2017
Registration Date
10-10-2017
Court
Sub Court, Tirur
Judge
1-Subordinate/Asst.Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Assainar
Adv. T.U Shak Abdulla
Respondent(s)
Kuruppath Muhammed
Ramla
Irshad
Faris
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate/Asst.Sessions Judge
Listed to
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
For commission report
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Listed to | |
| 12-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 07-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 28-01-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 23-01-2026 | For commission report |
Interim Orders
Summary: Interlocutory Application No. 5 of 2025 filed by Borogo Export and Import (Petitioner) in OS No. 77/2017 was dismissed by the Subordinate Judge of Tirur on 16th June 2025. The petition sought to summon the Commercial Tax Officer again to produce additional documents, but the court found this constituted an abuse of process as the witness had already been examined and documents produced earlier. The court declined to allow the petition under Civil Rules of Practice Rule 120(3), citing the petitioner's failure to justify the necessity or relevancy of the fresh summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Interlocutory Application No. 5 of 2025 filed by Borogo Export and Import (Petitioner) in OS No. 77/2017 was dismissed by the Subordinate Judge of Tirur on 16th June 2025. The petition sought to summon the Commercial Tax Officer again to produce additional documents, but the court found this constituted an abuse of process as the witness had already been examined and documents produced earlier. The court declined to allow the petition under Civil Rules of Practice Rule 120(3), citing the petitioner's failure to justify the necessity or relevancy of the fresh summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts