Kuruppath Muhammed vs Kondadan Hassainar — 18/2018

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26or7rule1. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLML120000742018

Listed to

Next Hearing

25th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

63/2018

Filing Date

21-02-2018

Registration No

18/2018

Registration Date

21-02-2018

Court

Sub Court, Tirur

Judge

1-Subordinate/Asst.Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26or7rule1
IA/1/2024 Classification : Section Kuruppath Muhammed
IA/2/2025 Classification : Section Kuruppath Muhammed

Petitioner(s)

Kuruppath Muhammed

Adv. Kunhali kutty Kadakualth

Respondent(s)

Kondadan Hassainar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate/Asst.Sessions Judge

09-03-2026

Listed to

12-02-2026

FOR HEARING

07-02-2026

FOR HEARING

28-01-2026

FOR HEARING

23-01-2026

With connected case

Interim Orders

17-10-2024
Judgement

Summary: The suit for money realization filed by Kuruppath Muhammad against Kondadan Hassainar was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 33,50,000 (thirty-three lakhs fifty thousand) with 6% per annum interest until realization, imposed a charge on the defendant's share in the scheduled property for the decree debt, and directed the defendant to pay the suit costs. The defendant's absence and ex parte status meant the plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence remained unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The suit for money realization filed by Kuruppath Muhammad against Kondadan Hassainar was decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court ordered the defendant to pay Rs. 33,50,000 (thirty-three lakhs fifty thousand) with 6% per annum interest until realization, imposed a charge on the defendant's share in the scheduled property for the decree debt, and directed the defendant to pay the suit costs. The defendant's absence and ex parte status meant the plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence remained unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Tirur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case