State of Kerala (Police) vs MUHAMMED SAHAD. M — 52/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,149,323,143,147. Status: No sitting notified. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLML100000692021
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
69/2021
Filing Date
16-01-2021
Registration No
52/2021
Registration Date
16-01-2021
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Malappuram
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate Court ,Malappuram
FIR Details
FIR Number
736
Police Station
Malappuram Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
MUHAMMED SAHAD. M
ANU ANSIL. K
MUHAMMED RASHIL. M. K
SALMAN FARSHAD
MUNAVAR. P
MUHAMMED MIDLAJ. V
MUHAMMED JURAIS
MUHAMMED BADUSHA. E
AKSHAY PRASAD
MUFASIL MARVAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate Court ,Malappuram
No sitting notified
Issue Summons
For appearance of the accused
Issue Bailable Warrant
Issue Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | No sitting notified | |
| 29-11-2025 | Issue Summons | |
| 01-09-2025 | For appearance of the accused | |
| 29-07-2025 | Issue Bailable Warrant | |
| 09-05-2025 | Issue Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Section 205 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed. The accused, Muhammad Shahad M., charged under IPC Sections 341, 149, 323, 143, and 147, is permitted to appear through counsel instead of personal appearance, subject to three conditions: he must not dispute his identity during trial, must not challenge evidence recorded in his absence, and must appear before the court when directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Section 205 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed. The accused, Muhammad Shahad M., charged under IPC Sections 341, 149, 323, 143, and 147, is permitted to appear through counsel instead of personal appearance, subject to three conditions: he must not dispute his identity during trial, must not challenge evidence recorded in his absence, and must appear before the court when directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts