Perinthalmanna Service Cooperative Bank Rep By Its Secretary vs Shamsudeen M Advocate - HASIF IQBAL — 200025/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21rule22,37. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLML030000952024

e-Filing Number

13-02-2024

Filing Number

68/2024

Filing Date

15-Feb-2024

Registration No

200025/2024

Registration Date

20-Feb-2024

Court

Sub Court, Manjeri

Judge

1-Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21rule22,37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Perinthalmanna Service Cooperative Bank Rep By Its Secretary

    Adv. Anil Thomas K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shamsudeen M Advocate - HASIF IQBAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Return of warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  5. 22-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

    The Sub Judge of Manjeri court found that the decree holder successfully proved the judgment debtor had sufficient means to pay the decretal amount of ₹11,05,861/- plus interest, as the debtor failed to provide evidence or testify to contradict the decree holder's claim that he runs a vehicle business earning ₹1,00,000 monthly. Consequently, the court issued an arrest warrant against the judgment debtor for willfully refusing to pay the decree despite having the financial capacity to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 22-Nov-2025

    Return of warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    Order/Judgement

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  8. 14-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    for evidence

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    For Steps

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  13. 27-Oct-2025

    Call with Ea

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  14. 17-Sep-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  16. 08-Sep-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  17. 27-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  19. 13-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  20. 06-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  21. 01-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  22. 02-Jul-2025

    Return of warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  23. 30-May-2025

    Issue Arrest Warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  24. 19-Mar-2025

    Issue Arrest Warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  25. 31-Jan-2025

    Issue Arrest Warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  26. 20-Nov-2024

    Issue Arrest Warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  27. 28-Sep-2024

    Issue Arrest Warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  28. 31-Jul-2024

    For Steps

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  29. 27-May-2024

    Issue fresh warrant

    Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri

  30. 20-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 15-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200025/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Sub Judge of Manjeri court found that the decree holder successfully proved the judgment debtor had sufficient means to pay the decretal amount of ₹11,05,861/- plus interest, as the debtor failed to provide evidence or testify to contradict the decree holder's claim that he runs a vehicle business earning ₹1,00,000 monthly. Consequently, the court issued an arrest warrant against the judgment debtor for willfully refusing to pay the decree despite having the financial capacity to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case