Perinthalmanna Service Cooperative Bank Rep By Its Secretary vs Shamsudeen M Advocate - HASIF IQBAL — 200025/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21rule22,37. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 09th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLML030000952024
e-Filing Number
13-02-2024
Filing Number
68/2024
Filing Date
15-02-2024
Registration No
200025/2024
Registration Date
20-02-2024
Court
Sub Court, Manjeri
Judge
1-Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Perinthalmanna Service Cooperative Bank Rep By Its Secretary
Adv. Anil Thomas K
Respondent(s)
Shamsudeen M Advocate - HASIF IQBAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Subordinate/ Assistant Sessions Judge, Manjeri
Disposed
Return of warrant
Return of warrant
Order/Judgement
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-01-2026 | Return of warrant | |
| 22-11-2025 | Return of warrant | |
| 20-11-2025 | Order/Judgement | |
| 14-11-2025 | Call on |
Final Orders / Judgements
Order
Interim Orders
The Sub Judge of Manjeri court found that the decree holder successfully proved the judgment debtor had sufficient means to pay the decretal amount of ₹11,05,861/- plus interest, as the debtor failed to provide evidence or testify to contradict the decree holder's claim that he runs a vehicle business earning ₹1,00,000 monthly. Consequently, the court issued an arrest warrant against the judgment debtor for willfully refusing to pay the decree despite having the financial capacity to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sub Judge of Manjeri court found that the decree holder successfully proved the judgment debtor had sufficient means to pay the decretal amount of ₹11,05,861/- plus interest, as the debtor failed to provide evidence or testify to contradict the decree holder's claim that he runs a vehicle business earning ₹1,00,000 monthly. Consequently, the court issued an arrest warrant against the judgment debtor for willfully refusing to pay the decree despite having the financial capacity to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts