Iquib Miyad P vs Ashraf M — 100003/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section26,Order7Rule1. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
OS Trd.Mrk - TRADE MARKS
CNR: KLML010043352022
e-Filing Number
23-09-2022
Filing Number
1354/2022
Filing Date
26-09-2022
Registration No
100003/2022
Registration Date
26-09-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Manjeri / Rent Control Appellate Authority,
Judge
4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Iquib Miyad P
Adv. MOHAMMED JASEER K
Arabian Majlis Llp
Adv. MOHAMMED JASEER K,ISMAIL ARIF
Respondent(s)
Ashraf M
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 21-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 10-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 29-01-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Judgement
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional District Judge-III of Manjeri dismissed the trademark infringement suit filed by Arabian Majlis LLP against defendants for using the "ARABIAN MAJLIS" mark, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to appear for evidence despite being granted time until 1:00 PM. The court noted that the plaintiffs had adequate opportunity to gather necessary documents within the six-month timeline set by the High Court and had no grounds for further adjournment after the High Court dismissed their extension petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional District Judge-III of Manjeri dismissed the trademark infringement suit filed by Arabian Majlis LLP against defendants for using the "ARABIAN MAJLIS" mark, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to appear for evidence despite being granted time until 1:00 PM. The court noted that the plaintiffs had adequate opportunity to gather necessary documents within the six-month timeline set by the High Court and had no grounds for further adjournment after the High Court dismissed their extension petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District and Sessions Court, Manjeri / Rent Control Appellate Authority, All courts →Explore other courts