Salmath @ Salmabi vs The Competent Authority and Deputy Collector — 100167/2020

Case under Petrolium Pipe Line (acquisition of Right of User on Land) Act 1962 Section Rule 5. Status: For evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

OP - ORIGINAL PETITION

CNR: KLML010018122019

For evidence

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

685/2019

Filing Date

03-06-2019

Registration No

100167/2020

Registration Date

23-07-2020

Court

District and Sessions Court, Manjeri / Rent Control Appellate Authority,

Judge

4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri

Acts & Sections

Petrolium Pipe Line (Acquisition of right of user on land) Act 1962 Section Rule 5
IA/1/2025 Classification : Section Salmath @ Salmabi

Petitioner(s)

Salmath @ Salmabi

Adv. Bilkees P.P

Respondent(s)

The Competent Authority and Deputy Collector

The Gail India Ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri

17-03-2026

For evidence

09-03-2026

For evidence

26-02-2026

For evidence

10-02-2026

For evidence

16-01-2026

For evidence

Interim Orders

11-02-2025
Order

Summary: In O.P. (Gail) No. 167/2020 before the Additional District Judge-III, Manjeri, the petition filed by Salmath under Section 10 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipe Line (Acquisition of right of user in Land) Act 1962 against GAIL India Ltd. was dismissed for default on February 11, 2025. The petitioner was absent during the hearing despite being represented by counsel, resulting in the dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.P. (Gail) No. 167/2020 before the Additional District Judge-III, Manjeri, the petition filed by Salmath under Section 10 of the Petroleum & Minerals Pipe Line (Acquisition of right of user in Land) Act 1962 against GAIL India Ltd. was dismissed for default on February 11, 2025. The petitioner was absent during the hearing despite being represented by counsel, resulting in the dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Manjeri / Rent Control Appellate Authority, All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case