Ashraf Karangadan vs The Competent Authority and Deputy Collector, GAIL India Ltd., — 100304/2022
Case under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act Section 10. Status: For evidence. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
OP - ORIGINAL PETITION
CNR: KLML010016982022
Filing Number
528/2022
Filing Date
07-Apr-2022
Registration No
100304/2022
Registration Date
08-Jun-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Manjeri / Rent Control Appellate Authority,
Judge
4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
Last updated 20-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashraf Karangadan
Adv. Anil KUmar K P
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Competent Authority and Deputy Collector, GAIL India Ltd.,
-
2.GAIL India Ltd.,
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
For evidence
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
09-Mar-2026
For commission report
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
23-Feb-2026
For commission report
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
21-Jan-2026
For commission report
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
19-Jan-2026
For Steps
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
16-Dec-2025
For Steps
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
31-Oct-2025
Call on
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
31-Oct-2025
Disposed
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
10-Dec-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary: In O.P. (Gail) No. 304/2022 before the Additional District Judge-III, Manjeri, the petition filed by Ashraf against GAIL India Ltd. and the Competent Authority under the Petroleum & Minerals Pipe Line (Acquisition of right of user in Land) Act 1962 was dismissed for default on December 10, 2024. The petition was posted for evidence, but since the petitioner was absent during the hearing, the court dismissed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Dec-2024
—
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
08-Oct-2024
For evidence
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
03-Sep-2024
For evidence
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
28-Jun-2024
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
27-Mar-2024
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
20-Dec-2023
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
26-Sep-2023
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
04-Aug-2023
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
02-Jun-2023
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
24-Feb-2023
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
20-Dec-2022
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
18-Oct-2022
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
18-Jul-2022
For Counter
Addl. District and Sessions Judge III / Rent Control Appellate Authority Manjeri
-
08-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100304/2022
Summary: In O.P. (Gail) No. 304/2022 before the Additional District Judge-III, Manjeri, the petition filed by Ashraf against GAIL India Ltd. and the Competent Authority under the Petroleum & Minerals Pipe Line (Acquisition of right of user in Land) Act 1962 was dismissed for default on December 10, 2024. The petition was posted for evidence, but since the petitioner was absent during the hearing, the court dismissed the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts