State of Kerala - Kidangoor Police vs Akash B Advocate - C S Ajayan, LIJO KURIAN JOSE — 1003/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)(n). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 23rd March 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKT350000662025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1609/2025

Filing Date

07-12-2024

Registration No

1003/2024

Registration Date

07-12-2024

Court

Fast Track Special Court, Erattupetta

Judge

1-Special Judge, FTSC Erattupetta

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS

FIR Details

FIR Number

525

Police Station

Kidangoor Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)(n)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 6,5(I)(j)(ii),12,11(iv)
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 Section 3(2)(v)
Crl.mp/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section State of Kerala - Kidangoor PoliceAkash B
Crl.mp/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section State of Kerala - Kidangoor PoliceAkash B

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala - Kidangoor Police

Respondent(s)

Akash B Advocate - C S Ajayan, LIJO KURIAN JOSE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Special Judge, FTSC Erattupetta

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

13-03-2026

FOR HEARING

12-03-2026

Defence Evidence

11-03-2026

For hearing under section 255 BNSS

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 1003/2024 Court Decision: Akash B was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 366, 375(a) r/w. 376(2)(n), POCSO Act sections 5(l) r/w. 6, 5(j)(ii) r/w. 6, and 11(iv) r/w. 12, and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(va). The court found the victim turned hostile, the victim was 18+ years old at the time of incident, and DNA evidence was inadmissible due to failure to establish proper chain of custody and non-compliance with Kerala Medico-Legal Code procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 1003/2024 Court Decision: Akash B was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 366, 375(a) r/w. 376(2)(n), POCSO Act sections 5(l) r/w. 6, 5(j)(ii) r/w. 6, and 11(iv) r/w. 12, and SC/ST Act section 3(2)(va). The court found the victim turned hostile, the victim was 18+ years old at the time of incident, and DNA evidence was inadmissible due to failure to establish proper chain of custody and non-compliance with Kerala Medico-Legal Code procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Fast Track Special Court, Erattupetta All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case