State of Kerala - Chingavanam Police vs Vishnu M — 100901/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,75,64,65(1),71. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 26th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKT320002842024
Filing Number
100086/2024
Filing Date
04-11-2024
Registration No
100901/2024
Registration Date
04-11-2024
Court
Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Judge
1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
831
Police Station
Chingavanam Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Chingavanam Police
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor, Fast Track Special Court (POCSO) Changanassery
Respondent(s)
Vishnu M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Disposed
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
For Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
| 18-03-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
| 16-03-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
| 12-03-2026 | For Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Vishnu M (Case 901/2024) The Fast Track Special Court in Changanassery acquitted 23-year-old Vishnu M of multiple charges including sexual assault, kidnapping, and offences under the POCSO Act on March 26, 2026. The court found that the victim (PW1) and her mother (PW2)—the prosecution's key witnesses—failed to support the case, with the victim explicitly denying that the accused committed any sexual violence against her. The court concluded there was absolutely no credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Vishnu M (Case 901/2024) The Fast Track Special Court in Changanassery acquitted 23-year-old Vishnu M of multiple charges including sexual assault, kidnapping, and offences under the POCSO Act on March 26, 2026. The court found that the victim (PW1) and her mother (PW2)—the prosecution's key witnesses—failed to support the case, with the victim explicitly denying that the accused committed any sexual violence against her. The court concluded there was absolutely no credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts