State of Kerala - Vakathanam Police vs Salimon A D Advocate - NIDHIN REJI KURIAKOSE — 628/2025

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 3(b), 4, 7, 8, 11(v), 12, 6, 5n, 5p, 10, 9n, 9p,4(2). Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKT320000762025

Filing Number

628/2025

Filing Date

01-Nov-2025

Registration No

628/2025

Registration Date

05-Nov-2025

Court

Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

Judge

1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

557

Police Station

Vakathanam Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 3(b), 4, 7, 8, 11(v), 12, 6, 5n, 5p, 10, 9n, 9p,4(2)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 63(b), 75(1)(i),75(2),64(i), 78(1), 123, 64(2)(f), 238, 65(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala - Vakathanam Police

    Adv. Special Public Prosecutor, Fast Track Special Court (POCSO) Changanassery

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Salimon A D Advocate - NIDHIN REJI KURIAKOSE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Sessions Case 628/2025 The Fast Track Special Judge at Changanassery acquitted Salimon A D of all charges under POCSO Act and BNS provisions related to alleged sexual assault on a minor. The court found the victim (PW1) and her father (PW2)—the prosecution's key witnesses—unreliable, as both retracted their police statements in court. The victim specifically denied the accused administered liquor or committed sexual violence against her, and stated she underwent no medical examination. With no corroborating evidence, the court determined insufficient proof of the charges and acquitted the accused under Section 255 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    For hearing under section 255 Bnss

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Issue Summons

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing on Charge

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  12. 22-Jan-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  14. 16-Jan-2026

    For Production of Accused

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  15. 12-Jan-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  16. 05-Jan-2026

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  17. 29-Dec-2025

    Call On

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  18. 19-Dec-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  19. 06-Dec-2025

    Remand Extended

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  20. 24-Nov-2025

    Call On

    Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery

  21. 13-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 01-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 628/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case 628/2025 The Fast Track Special Judge at Changanassery acquitted Salimon A D of all charges under POCSO Act and BNS provisions related to alleged sexual assault on a minor. The court found the victim (PW1) and her father (PW2)—the prosecution's key witnesses—unreliable, as both retracted their police statements in court. The victim specifically denied the accused administered liquor or committed sexual violence against her, and stated she underwent no medical examination. With no corroborating evidence, the court determined insufficient proof of the charges and acquitted the accused under Section 255 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case