State of Kerala - Pallikkathode Police vs Binu Vijayan — 100337/2025
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 6,5j(ii),5(l),5(q),10,9(l),9(q),16,21. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 28th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKT320000552025
Filing Number
1000005/2025
Filing Date
08-05-2025
Registration No
100337/2025
Registration Date
08-05-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Judge
1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
182
Police Station
Pallikkathode Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Pallikkathode Police
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor, Fast Track Special Court (POCSO) Changanassery
Respondent(s)
Binu Vijayan
Sulekha T K
Sini Vijayan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Disposed
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
Call On
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
| 21-04-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
| 01-04-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
| 26-03-2026 | Call On |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Fast Track Special Judge acquitted all three accused under Sessions Case 337/2025 of charges under the POCSO Act and BNS, finding absolutely no incriminating evidence. The victim (PW1) disowned her police statement and categorically denied that the first accused committed sexual assault on her while she was a minor, and the sister (PW2) retracted key portions of her FIR statement. The court held that DNA evidence alone, without corroborating testimony from the victim, cannot establish guilt in child sexual abuse cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Fast Track Special Judge acquitted all three accused under Sessions Case 337/2025 of charges under the POCSO Act and BNS, finding absolutely no incriminating evidence. The victim (PW1) disowned her police statement and categorically denied that the first accused committed sexual assault on her while she was a minor, and the sister (PW2) retracted key portions of her FIR statement. The court held that DNA evidence alone, without corroborating testimony from the victim, cannot establish guilt in child sexual abuse cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts