State of Kerala - Erumeli Police vs Favas Faisal K.M — 100243/2025
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 11(v),12. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 24th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKT320000412025
Filing Number
100006/2025
Filing Date
24-03-2025
Registration No
100243/2025
Registration Date
24-03-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Judge
1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
82
Police Station
Erattupettah Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Erumeli Police
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor, Fast Track Special Court (POCSO) Changanassery
Respondent(s)
Favas Faisal K.M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Disposed
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
For hearing under section 255 BNSS
For Evidence
Call On
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
| 16-03-2026 | For hearing under section 255 BNSS |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Call On |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sessions Case 243/2025 The Fast Track Special Court in Changanassery acquitted Favas Faisal K.M of all charges under BNS (sexual assault, criminal intimidation) and POCSO Act, finding no credible evidence against him. The victim's mother (PW1) and the victim herself (PW2)—the key prosecution witnesses—retracted their original statements, denying the accused's involvement and stating he was unknown to them. With material witnesses unsupportive and no corroborating evidence linking the accused to the alleged offences, the court found him not guilty and set him at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case 243/2025 The Fast Track Special Court in Changanassery acquitted Favas Faisal K.M of all charges under BNS (sexual assault, criminal intimidation) and POCSO Act, finding no credible evidence against him. The victim's mother (PW1) and the victim herself (PW2)—the key prosecution witnesses—retracted their original statements, denying the accused's involvement and stating he was unknown to them. With material witnesses unsupportive and no corroborating evidence linking the accused to the alleged offences, the court found him not guilty and set him at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts