State of Kerala - Chingavanam Police vs Abhinand K M — 100205/2025
Case under Information Technology Act Section 67B. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 18th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKT320000292025
Filing Number
100108/2025
Filing Date
14-Mar-2025
Registration No
100205/2025
Registration Date
14-Mar-2025
Court
Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Judge
1-Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1609
Police Station
Chingavanam Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala - Chingavanam Police
Adv. Special Public Prosecutor, Fast Track Special Court (POCSO) Changanassery
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abhinand K M
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Abhinand K M (Case 205/2025) The Fast Track Special Court acquitted 20-year-old Abhinand K M of charges under BNS sections 351(2), 64(1), POCSO Act sections 3(a) and 4, and IT Act section 67B(a). The prosecution alleged he befriended a minor via Instagram, coerced her to send nude photos, and committed sexual assault in October-November 2024. However, the victim (PW1) retracted her initial complaint at trial, denying knowing the accused, denying any sexual assault occurred, and stating she was not coerced to send photos. The victim's mother (PW2) similarly disavowed her prior statement. Finding the key witnesses untrustworthy and lacking evidence to connect the accused to the alleged offences, the court acquitted him and released seized mobile phones after forensic clearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
17-Mar-2026
For hearing under section 255 Bnss
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
16-Mar-2026
For hearing under section 255 Bnss
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
12-Mar-2026
For hearing under section 255 Bnss
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
07-Mar-2026
For hearing under section 255 Bnss
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
25-Feb-2026
For Evidence
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
23-Feb-2026
Call On
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
17-Jan-2026
Call On
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
12-Dec-2025
Call On
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
22-Nov-2025
Call On
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
03-Nov-2025
Call On
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
30-Oct-2025
For Framing Charge
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
24-Oct-2025
For Framing Charge
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
26-Sep-2025
For Framing Charge
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
12-Sep-2025
Call On
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
04-Aug-2025
For Framing Charge
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
14-Jul-2025
Call On
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
25-Jun-2025
Call On
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
15-May-2025
For Framing Charge
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
10-Apr-2025
For Framing Charge
Special Judge Fast Track Special Court Changanassery
-
02-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 100205/2025
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Abhinand K M (Case 205/2025) The Fast Track Special Court acquitted 20-year-old Abhinand K M of charges under BNS sections 351(2), 64(1), POCSO Act sections 3(a) and 4, and IT Act section 67B(a). The prosecution alleged he befriended a minor via Instagram, coerced her to send nude photos, and committed sexual assault in October-November 2024. However, the victim (PW1) retracted her initial complaint at trial, denying knowing the accused, denying any sexual assault occurred, and stating she was not coerced to send photos. The victim's mother (PW2) similarly disavowed her prior statement. Finding the key witnesses untrustworthy and lacking evidence to connect the accused to the alleged offences, the court acquitted him and released seized mobile phones after forensic clearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts