Gopinathan Nair vs Harikumar — 100399/2017
Case under Laws Local Extent Act Section 26. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKT250005652017
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
100399/2017
Filing Date
04-12-2017
Registration No
100399/2017
Registration Date
04-12-2017
Court
Munsiff Court, Changanacherry
Judge
1-MUNSIFF CHANGANACHERRY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gopinathan Nair
Adv. Shanimol P.S., Shanimol P.S.
Respondent(s)
Harikumar
Indira R. Nair @ Valsamma
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF CHANGANACHERRY
Call On
With Connected Case
With Connected Case
With Connected Case
With Connected Case
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Call On |
| 09-06-2026 | With Connected Case |
| 06-06-2026 | With Connected Case |
| 03-06-2026 | With Connected Case |
| 02-06-2026 | With Connected Case |
Interim Orders
Case 100399/2017 - Summary The Munsiff Court in Changanacherry reviewed the June 9, 2025 order listing the property partition suit for trial. The court found that the advocate commissioner's report on property measurements contained unresolved discrepancies—the properties were measured according to resurvey records rather than the partition deed as directed, and a remit-back report filed in January 2022 failed to cure these defects. The court held that proceeding to trial on such a flawed report would not serve justice. The order listing the case for trial was reviewed and set aside, and the court appointed a new advocate commissioner and surveyor to prepare a corrected report complying with the partition deed specifications. The matter was posted for pre-trial steps with directions to the petitioner to proceed diligently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 100399/2017 - Summary The Munsiff Court in Changanacherry reviewed the June 9, 2025 order listing the property partition suit for trial. The court found that the advocate commissioner's report on property measurements contained unresolved discrepancies—the properties were measured according to resurvey records rather than the partition deed as directed, and a remit-back report filed in January 2022 failed to cure these defects. The court held that proceeding to trial on such a flawed report would not serve justice. The order listing the case for trial was reviewed and set aside, and the court appointed a new advocate commissioner and surveyor to prepare a corrected report complying with the partition deed specifications. The matter was posted for pre-trial steps with directions to the petitioner to proceed diligently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts