The Federal Bank KarukachalBranch vs Joseph Paranthara Joseph Advocate - ANIL KUMAR P — 220/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--MATTER SETTLED THROUGH MEDIATION on 01st April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLKT250004182025
Filing Number
375/2025
Filing Date
16-Aug-2025
Registration No
220/2025
Registration Date
22-Aug-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Changanacherry
Judge
1-Munsiff Changanacherry
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--MATTER SETTLED THROUGH MEDIATION
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Federal Bank KarukachalBranch
Adv. DEEPU VISWANATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Joseph Paranthara Joseph Advocate - ANIL KUMAR P
-
2.Jomol Joseph
Adv. ANIL KUMAR P
-
3.Mariyamma Joseph
Adv. ANIL KUMAR P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
The Munsiff Court of Changanacherry decreed the suit between The Federal Bank Ltd. and the defendants (Joseph Paranthara Joseph, Jomol Joseph, and Mariyamma Joseph) based on a compromise agreement reached by the parties through mediation. The court accepted the lawful compromise prepared by the Advocate Commissioner and incorporated it into the decree, refunding court fees paid by the plaintiff with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Munsiff Changanacherry
-
16-Mar-2026
Report on Mediation
Munsiff Changanacherry
-
20-Feb-2026
Report on Mediation
Munsiff Changanacherry
-
24-Jan-2026
Appearance of Parties
Munsiff Changanacherry
-
05-Jan-2026
Appearance of Parties
Munsiff Changanacherry
-
04-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Changanacherry
-
04-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Changanacherry
-
24-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff Changanacherry
-
22-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 220/2025
The Munsiff Court of Changanacherry decreed the suit between The Federal Bank Ltd. and the defendants (Joseph Paranthara Joseph, Jomol Joseph, and Mariyamma Joseph) based on a compromise agreement reached by the parties through mediation. The court accepted the lawful compromise prepared by the Advocate Commissioner and incorporated it into the decree, refunding court fees paid by the plaintiff with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts