Neena vs Radhama (Died) — 31/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O20,26R10,13,18. Disposed: Contested--FINAL DECREE PASSED. on 21st March 2026.
FDA - FINAL DECREE APPLICATION
CNR: KLKT250002562020
Filing Number
304/2020
Filing Date
07-07-2020
Registration No
31/2020
Registration Date
08-07-2020
Court
Munsiff Court, Changanacherry
Judge
1-MUNSIFF CHANGANACHERRY
Decision Date
21st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--FINAL DECREE PASSED.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Neena
Adv. B. Ashok
Preetha
Adv. B Ashok
Anil Prasad Sen J
Adv. B Ashok
Soya
Adv. B Ashok
Asha Prasad Sen
Adv. B Ashok
Respondent(s)
Radhama (Died)
Jyotheendranad
G Baburaj
Adv. K Pradeep,GLORY V GREGORY
Renanzen
Adv. K Pradeep,GLORY V GREGORY
G Vijayakumari
Adv. K Pradeep,GLORY V GREGORY
G Sudadevi
Adv. K Pradeep,GLORY V GREGORY
Sreedevi Sukumar
Adv. K Pradeep,GLORY V GREGORY
Jayakrishnaraj G
Adv. K Pradeep,GLORY V GREGORY
Bibin Nath
Adv. K Pradeep
Babitha
Adv. K Pradeep
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MUNSIFF CHANGANACHERRY
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Verify And Report
Issue Notice
Call On
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | Verify And Report |
| 16-03-2026 | Issue Notice |
| 13-03-2026 | Call On |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Munsiff Court of Changanacherry issued a final decree for partition of jointly-held property in two consolidated cases (OS 40/1997 and OS 365/1996). Based on a court-appointed surveyor's report, the court divided the property into equal shares: plaintiffs and defendants each received 1/3 share (23.750 cents each) in OS 40/1997 and 1/2 share (36.625 cents each) in OS 365/1996, with partition effected by metes and bounds as shown in the survey plan. Parties were directed to take separate possession through execution proceedings and bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Munsiff Court of Changanacherry issued a final decree for partition of jointly-held property in two consolidated cases (OS 40/1997 and OS 365/1996). Based on a court-appointed surveyor's report, the court divided the property into equal shares: plaintiffs and defendants each received 1/3 share (23.750 cents each) in OS 40/1997 and 1/2 share (36.625 cents each) in OS 365/1996, with partition effected by metes and bounds as shown in the survey plan. Parties were directed to take separate possession through execution proceedings and bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts