All Kerala Private Bankers Association Changanassery Taluk Committee vs All Kerala Private Bankers Association State Committee — 100118/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 & Order 7 Rule 1. Status: Payment of Balance Court Fee. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Payment of Balance Court Fee Next hearing 20-Jun-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT250002552025

e-Filing Number

18-05-2025

Filing Number

100231/2025

Filing Date

19-May-2025

Registration No

100118/2025

Registration Date

19-May-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Changanacherry

Judge

1-Munsiff Changanacherry

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 & Order 7 Rule 1
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Section All Kerala Private Bankers Association Changanassery Taluk CommitteeAll Kerala Private Bankers Association State Committee
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Section All Kerala Private Bankers Association Changanassery Taluk CommitteeAll Kerala Private Bankers Association State Committee

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.All Kerala Private Bankers Association Changanassery Taluk Committee

    Adv. PRADEEPKUMAR S, PRADEEPKUMAR S

  2. 2.M C Thomas

    Adv. PRADEEPKUMAR S,Joy Joseph

  3. 3.Ravindranadha Kurup

    Adv. PRADEEPKUMAR S,Joy Joseph

  4. 4.Kunjumon U P

    Adv. PRADEEPKUMAR S,Joy Joseph

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.All Kerala Private Bankers Association State Committee

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-May-2026

    Payment of Balance Court Fee

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Payment of Balance Court Fee

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  6. 16-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  7. 16-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  9. 14-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  10. 14-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 100118/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction petitions (IA 1/2025 and IA 3/2025) DISMISSED with no costs ordered. Key Facts: The Changanacherry Taluk Committee of the All Kerala Private Bankers Association sought to prevent the State Committee from dissolving their committee and barring them from office for 6 years. The court found that while plaintiffs established a prima facie case of disputed procedure, the balance of convenience favored the respondents because: (1) disciplinary proceedings were pending against the plaintiffs when the suit was filed on 19-05-2025 (notice served 17-05-2025); (2) the association requires a functional committee; and (3) the election process had already commenced. The court ruled that procedural and substantive issues should be decided at trial, not via injunction, and that granting the injunction would obstruct democratic election processes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 14-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Orders In IA

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  13. 20-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 19-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100118/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100118/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction petitions (IA 1/2025 and IA 3/2025) DISMISSED with no costs ordered. Key Facts: The Changanacherry Taluk Committee of the All Kerala Private Bankers Association sought to prevent the State Committee from dissolving their committee and barring them from office for 6 years. The court found that while plaintiffs established a prima facie case of disputed procedure, the balance of convenience favored the respondents because: (1) disciplinary proceedings were pending against the plaintiffs when the suit was filed on 19-05-2025 (notice served 17-05-2025); (2) the association requires a functional committee; and (3) the election process had already commenced. The court ruled that procedural and substantive issues should be decided at trial, not via injunction, and that granting the injunction would obstruct democratic election processes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case