Dhanush Mohan vs Aniyan Advocate - Krishna Das — 100116/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,O7,R1. Status: Pre Trial Steps. Next hearing: 26th June 2026.

Pre Trial Steps Next hearing 26-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT250001912023

Filing Number

100201/2023

Filing Date

13-Apr-2023

Registration No

100116/2023

Registration Date

13-Apr-2023

Court

Munsiff Court, Changanacherry

Judge

1-Munsiff Changanacherry

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhanush Mohan

    Adv. SAJI KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aniyan Advocate - Krishna Das

Case History

  1. 26-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  5. 21-Mar-2026

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Objection to Cr

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  11. 07-Feb-2026

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  13. 15-Jan-2026

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    Issue Notice

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  15. 03-Dec-2025

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  16. 03-Nov-2025

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  17. 23-Oct-2025

    Pre Trial Steps

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  18. 03-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  19. 27-Sep-2025

    No Further Time

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  20. 25-Sep-2025

    For Replication

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  21. 24-Sep-2025

    Orders In IA

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  22. 23-Sep-2025

    For Objection and Hearing

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  23. 22-Sep-2025

    For Objection and Hearing

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  24. 19-Sep-2025

    For Objection

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  25. 12-Sep-2025

    For Objection

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  26. 26-Aug-2025

    Interim Order

    CASE SUMMARY: 100116/2023 In this money suit, the Court of the Munsiff, Changanacherry allowed the plaintiff Dhanush Mohan's petition to remit back the expert commission report. The expert's testimony revealed significant discrepancies and contradictions regarding the total valuation of construction work (ranging between ₹23,76,000 and ₹27,80,000), inclusion/exclusion of contract commission amounts, and expenses for additional work items. The court found the report inadequate for fair adjudication without proper assessment of disputed points and the subsisting agreement regarding contract commission. The expert is directed to submit a fresh report addressing these discrepancies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 26-Aug-2025

    For Commission Report

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  28. 04-Aug-2025

    Orders In IA

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  29. 26-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  30. 21-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  31. 16-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  32. 11-Jul-2025

    Further Evidence

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  33. 30-Jun-2025

    Further Evidence

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  34. 23-Jun-2025

    For Evidence

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  35. 16-Jun-2025

    For Evidence

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  36. 26-May-2025

    For Settlement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  37. 21-May-2025

    For Evidence

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  38. 27-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  39. 14-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  40. 17-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  41. 25-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  42. 20-Dec-2024

    Report on Mediation

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  43. 06-Dec-2024

    Report on Mediation

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  44. 25-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  45. 08-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  46. 18-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  47. 23-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  48. 29-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  49. 16-Aug-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  50. 30-Jul-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  51. 11-Jul-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  52. 25-May-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  53. 02-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  54. 06-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  55. 10-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  56. 05-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Changanacherry

  57. 19-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 13-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100116/2023

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: 100116/2023 In this money suit, the Court of the Munsiff, Changanacherry allowed the plaintiff Dhanush Mohan's petition to remit back the expert commission report. The expert's testimony revealed significant discrepancies and contradictions regarding the total valuation of construction work (ranging between ₹23,76,000 and ₹27,80,000), inclusion/exclusion of contract commission amounts, and expenses for additional work items. The court found the report inadequate for fair adjudication without proper assessment of disputed points and the subsisting agreement regarding contract commission. The expert is directed to submit a fresh report addressing these discrepancies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case