Ajeesh K vs Biju Thomas — 2857/2018

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th April 2026.

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLKT240113982018

Case disposed

Filing Number

2857/2018

Filing Date

20-12-2018

Registration No

2857/2018

Registration Date

20-12-2018

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Changanacherry

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I, CHANGANACHERRY

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138,142
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Ajeesh KBiju Thomas
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Application For Direction To Produce Documents Section Ajeesh KBiju Thomas

Petitioner(s)

Ajeesh K

Respondent(s)

Biju Thomas

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I, CHANGANACHERRY

30-04-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

Order/Judgement

18-04-2026

For Hearing

31-03-2026

For Objecting and Hearing CMP

16-03-2026

For Objection

Interim Orders

27-04-2026
Judgement

Summary of Case 2857/2018 The court acquitted accused Biju Thomas of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. Though the accused's cheque signature was undisputed (triggering statutory presumptions), the court found the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt beyond reasonable doubt. Bank evidence showed the accused had made Rs.1 lakh in part payments to the complainant, which were not acknowledged or endorsed on the cheque as required by law, rendering the full cheque amount legally unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 2857/2018 The court acquitted accused Biju Thomas of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. Though the accused's cheque signature was undisputed (triggering statutory presumptions), the court found the complainant failed to prove a legally enforceable debt beyond reasonable doubt. Bank evidence showed the accused had made Rs.1 lakh in part payments to the complainant, which were not acknowledged or endorsed on the cheque as required by law, rendering the full cheque amount legally unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Changanacherry All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case