State of Kerala - Erattupetta Police vs BEENA SASI — 582/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 336. Status: To Summon Witness. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKT210049832022
Filing Number
5001/2022
Filing Date
19-Nov-2022
Registration No
582/2022
Registration Date
19-Nov-2022
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Erattupetta
Judge
1-Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1592
Police Station
Erattupettah Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala - Erattupetta Police
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 1, Erattupetta
Respondent(s)
-
1.BEENA SASI
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
To Summon Witness
Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 582/2022 Summary: Beena Sasi's petition for discharge under Section 262(2) BNSS was dismissed on 16 March 2026. Accused of allowing an unlicensed child to operate her scooter (IPC §336 and MV Act §199A), Beena argued she had no knowledge of the offense and was entitled to discharge. The court found the charges were not groundless at the preliminary stage, as a related case against the minor driver was pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, and declined to grant discharge before trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
For Framing Charge
Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders In Cmp
Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta
-
02-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta
-
23-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta
-
11-Feb-2026
For Framing Charge
Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta
-
28-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 582/2022
Case 582/2022 Summary: Beena Sasi's petition for discharge under Section 262(2) BNSS was dismissed on 16 March 2026. Accused of allowing an unlicensed child to operate her scooter (IPC §336 and MV Act §199A), Beena argued she had no knowledge of the offense and was entitled to discharge. The court found the charges were not groundless at the preliminary stage, as a related case against the minor driver was pending before the Juvenile Justice Board, and declined to grant discharge before trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts