Muhammad Nasim vs Ansa Azad Advocate - Rathish Kumar P R — 202525/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION

CNR: KLKT210029922023

e-Filing Number

02-08-2023

Filing Number

2992/2023

Filing Date

02-Aug-2023

Registration No

202525/2023

Registration Date

03-Aug-2023

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Erattupetta

Judge

1-Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muhammad Nasim

    Adv. BIJU P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ansa Azad Advocate - Rathish Kumar P R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: ST 2525/2023 - Muhammad Nasim v. Ansa Asad Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ansa Asad under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after finding she executed a cheque dated 19.05.2023 for ₹28,00,000 in discharge of a legally enforceable debt of ₹23,00,000 that the complainant had loaned her in November 2021. The cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and the statutory notice requirements were satisfied. Sentence: The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹28,00,000 (approximately double the original loan amount plus interest at 9% per annum, as per Supreme Court guidelines), with three months simple imprisonment in default. The fine will be awarded as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    For Further Hearing

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  7. 31-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    For Objection and Hearing

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Issue Bailable Warrant to Witness

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  11. 06-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  13. 19-Feb-2026

    Orders In Cmp

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    For Objecting and Hearing Cmp

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  15. 13-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  16. 10-Feb-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  17. 02-Feb-2026

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  18. 31-Jan-2026

    For Objection and Hearing

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  19. 28-Jan-2026

    Further Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  20. 23-Jan-2026

    For Production of Documents/Affidavit

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  21. 14-Jan-2026

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  22. 09-Jan-2026

    Issue Bailable Warrant to Witness

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  23. 31-Dec-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  24. 27-Dec-2025

    Further Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  25. 22-Dec-2025

    Call On

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  26. 02-Dec-2025

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  27. 12-Nov-2025

    Issue Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  28. 30-Oct-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  29. 10-Oct-2025

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  30. 25-Sep-2025

    Call On

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  31. 21-Aug-2025

    Bound Over

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  32. 16-Jun-2025

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  33. 26-Mar-2025

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  34. 07-Jan-2025

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  35. 05-Nov-2024

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  36. 03-Sep-2024

    For Objecting and Hearing Cmp

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  37. 11-Jun-2024

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  38. 18-Apr-2024

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  39. 27-Feb-2024

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  40. 16-Jan-2024

    For Evidence

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  41. 04-Dec-2023

    Issue Bailable Warrant

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  42. 06-Nov-2023

    For Appearance of Accused

    Judicial 1St Class Magistrate Erattupetta

  43. 11-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 02-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 202525/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ST 2525/2023 - Muhammad Nasim v. Ansa Asad Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ansa Asad under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after finding she executed a cheque dated 19.05.2023 for ₹28,00,000 in discharge of a legally enforceable debt of ₹23,00,000 that the complainant had loaned her in November 2021. The cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and the statutory notice requirements were satisfied. Sentence: The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹28,00,000 (approximately double the original loan amount plus interest at 9% per annum, as per Supreme Court guidelines), with three months simple imprisonment in default. The fine will be awarded as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case