Muhammad Nasim vs Ansa Azad Advocate - Rathish Kumar P R — 202525/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.
Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION
CNR: KLKT210029922023
e-Filing Number
02-08-2023
Filing Number
2992/2023
Filing Date
02-08-2023
Registration No
202525/2023
Registration Date
03-08-2023
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Erattupetta
Judge
1-JUDICIAL 1ST CLASS MAGISTRATE ERATTUPETTA
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muhammad Nasim
Adv. BIJU P
Respondent(s)
Ansa Azad Advocate - Rathish Kumar P R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL 1ST CLASS MAGISTRATE ERATTUPETTA
Disposed
Disposed
Order/Judgement
For Further Hearing
For Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 01-04-2026 | For Further Hearing |
| 31-03-2026 | For Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ST 2525/2023 - Muhammad Nasim v. Ansa Asad Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ansa Asad under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after finding she executed a cheque dated 19.05.2023 for ₹28,00,000 in discharge of a legally enforceable debt of ₹23,00,000 that the complainant had loaned her in November 2021. The cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and the statutory notice requirements were satisfied. Sentence: The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹28,00,000 (approximately double the original loan amount plus interest at 9% per annum, as per Supreme Court guidelines), with three months simple imprisonment in default. The fine will be awarded as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ST 2525/2023 - Muhammad Nasim v. Ansa Asad Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ansa Asad under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after finding she executed a cheque dated 19.05.2023 for ₹28,00,000 in discharge of a legally enforceable debt of ₹23,00,000 that the complainant had loaned her in November 2021. The cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and the statutory notice requirements were satisfied. Sentence: The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹28,00,000 (approximately double the original loan amount plus interest at 9% per annum, as per Supreme Court guidelines), with three months simple imprisonment in default. The fine will be awarded as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts