Jerin M. George vs P.Y.Abdul Latheef — 120/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 16th March 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT200002782025

Case disposed

Filing Number

290/2025

Filing Date

14-08-2025

Registration No

120/2025

Registration Date

14-08-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Erattupetta

Judge

1-MUNSIFF ERATTUPETTA

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Section Jerin M. GeorgeP.Y.Abdul Latheef
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Section Jerin M. George
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Application to Accept Power of Attorney Section Jerin M. GeorgeP.Y.Abdul Latheef

Petitioner(s)

Jerin M. George

Adv. SASIDHARAN V N

Respondent(s)

P.Y.Abdul Latheef

Finesh P.H.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF ERATTUPETTA

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Call On

28-02-2026

Call On

16-01-2026

Call On

20-11-2025

For Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Judgement

The Munsiff Court of Erattupetta granted Jerin M. George's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants P.Y. Abdul Latheef and Finesh P.H. The court, proceeding ex-parte after defendants failed to appear despite proper service, found that the plaintiff validly owns the property via Settlement Deed and possesses valid building permits. The court restrained the defendants from trespassing into the property, obstructing construction activities, or demolishing the boundary structures (tin sheet screens and green nets). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Munsiff Court of Erattupetta granted Jerin M. George's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants P.Y. Abdul Latheef and Finesh P.H. The court, proceeding ex-parte after defendants failed to appear despite proper service, found that the plaintiff validly owns the property via Settlement Deed and possesses valid building permits. The court restrained the defendants from trespassing into the property, obstructing construction activities, or demolishing the boundary structures (tin sheet screens and green nets). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Erattupetta All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case