Jerin M. George vs P.Y.Abdul Latheef — 120/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT200002782025

Filing Number

290/2025

Filing Date

14-Aug-2025

Registration No

120/2025

Registration Date

14-Aug-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Erattupetta

Judge

1-Munsiff Erattupetta

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jerin M. George

    Adv. SASIDHARAN V N

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.P.Y.Abdul Latheef

  2. 2.Finesh P.H.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Munsiff Court of Erattupetta granted Jerin M. George's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants P.Y. Abdul Latheef and Finesh P.H. The court, proceeding ex-parte after defendants failed to appear despite proper service, found that the plaintiff validly owns the property via Settlement Deed and possesses valid building permits. The court restrained the defendants from trespassing into the property, obstructing construction activities, or demolishing the boundary structures (tin sheet screens and green nets). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff Erattupetta

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Call On

    Munsiff Erattupetta

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Call On

    Munsiff Erattupetta

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Call On

    Munsiff Erattupetta

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    For Evidence

    Munsiff Erattupetta

  8. 19-Sep-2025

    For Evidence

    Munsiff Erattupetta

  9. 14-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Munsiff Court of Erattupetta granted Jerin M. George's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants P.Y. Abdul Latheef and Finesh P.H. The court, proceeding ex-parte after defendants failed to appear despite proper service, found that the plaintiff validly owns the property via Settlement Deed and possesses valid building permits. The court restrained the defendants from trespassing into the property, obstructing construction activities, or demolishing the boundary structures (tin sheet screens and green nets). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case