State of Kerala - Karukachal Police vs SHAMSEER C R @ ARUN MANDARA POO (CC 630/ — 883/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,461,380,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLKT190041872025
Filing Number
5919/2025
Filing Date
28-06-2025
Registration No
883/2015
Registration Date
07-07-2015
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
441
Police Station
Karukachal Police Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala - Karukachal Police
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 2, Kanjirappally
Respondent(s)
SHAMSEER C R @ ARUN MANDARA POO (CC 630/
KKL
SUNNY JOSEPH@PALAKKAYAM SUNNY SIJO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Return of Warrant
Issue NBW
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Return of Warrant |
| 25-02-2026 | Issue NBW |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC 883/2015 Court Decision: The first accused, Shamseer C.R @ Arun Mandara Poo, was acquitted under Section 248(1) CrPC for offences under IPC sections 380, 454, and 461 (theft, house-breaking, and burglary). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, relying solely on confession statements without sufficient corroborating evidence, forensic evidence, or eyewitness testimony. The case against the third accused was separated and refiled as CC 888/2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 883/2015 Court Decision: The first accused, Shamseer C.R @ Arun Mandara Poo, was acquitted under Section 248(1) CrPC for offences under IPC sections 380, 454, and 461 (theft, house-breaking, and burglary). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, relying solely on confession statements without sufficient corroborating evidence, forensic evidence, or eyewitness testimony. The case against the third accused was separated and refiled as CC 888/2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts