State of Kerala - Karukachal Police vs Aseena — 991/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 451, 323, 34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLKT190040322025

Filing Number

5891/2025

Filing Date

21-Jun-2025

Registration No

991/2017

Registration Date

06-Oct-2017

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

Karukachal Police Station

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 451, 323, 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala - Karukachal Police

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 2, Kanjirappally

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aseena

  2. 2.Aneesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of CC No. 991/2017 The court acquitted the first accused (Aseena) of charges under IPC sections 323, 451 r/w 34 (causing hurt and criminal trespass) due to significant discrepancies and contradictions in prosecution witness statements, lack of recovered material objects, and the possibility of false implication arising from civil disputes. The second accused's case was split up as he did not appear. The court applied the principle that guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt and granted the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  13. 15-Jan-2026

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  14. 01-Jan-2026

    NBW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  15. 22-Dec-2025

    For Want of Time

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  16. 10-Dec-2025

    BW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  18. 28-Oct-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    BW to Cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  20. 29-Sep-2025

    Adjourned

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  21. 23-Sep-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  22. 09-Sep-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  23. 14-Aug-2025

    To Summon Witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Kanjirappally

  24. 21-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 21-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 991/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CC No. 991/2017 The court acquitted the first accused (Aseena) of charges under IPC sections 323, 451 r/w 34 (causing hurt and criminal trespass) due to significant discrepancies and contradictions in prosecution witness statements, lack of recovered material objects, and the possibility of false implication arising from civil disputes. The second accused's case was split up as he did not appear. The court applied the principle that guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt and granted the accused the benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case