State of Kerala - Erumeli Police vs Manoj George @ Binoy — 405/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(i). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.

FIR - FIRST INFORMATION REPORT

CNR: KLKT190031892020

Case disposed

Filing Number

3192/2020

Filing Date

21-06-2020

Registration No

405/2020

Registration Date

24-08-2020

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

575

Police Station

Erumeli Police Station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 294(b),506(i)
Healthcare Services Pension and Healthcare Service Institution (Prevention of Violence and Damage to Property) Act, 2012 Section sec.3 r/w4

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala - Erumeli Police

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor, JFCM 2, Kanjirappally

Respondent(s)

Manoj George @ Binoy

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - II, KANJIRAPPALLY

27-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Order/Judgement

17-03-2026

For Hearing

16-03-2026

For Hearing

03-03-2026

Adjourned

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: CC 405/2020 Court Decision: Manoj George @ Binoy was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words) and 506(i) (criminal intimidation), as well as under the Kerala Health Care Service Persons Act 2012. The court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the prosecution relied solely on the complainant's testimony while critical CCTV footage was not recovered by investigators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 405/2020 Court Decision: Manoj George @ Binoy was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 294(b) (obscene words) and 506(i) (criminal intimidation), as well as under the Kerala Health Care Service Persons Act 2012. The court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the prosecution relied solely on the complainant's testimony while critical CCTV footage was not recovered by investigators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-2, Kanjirappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case